From: michael <mi...@ap...> - 2004-09-11 15:46:05
|
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, michael wrote: >> I understand better now.. If its to a nonexistent user Sid-Milter does not >> do any checks. > > Well, more accurately, it never gets to do any checks because the MTA > never tells milter about those recipients. > >> The only time Sid-Milter does any checks is if the recipient is known... >> if its from=<> or from=<somename@somehost> and is to a valid recpient >> name. > > Correct. > >> If I am correct then dictionary attacks to nonexistent users will still >> be an issue with the volume of info in the maillogs. > > Yes, that's correct, but is Sender ID really supposed to tackle that > problem? Good point. Thanks, Michael... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > sid-milter-discuss mailing list > sid...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sid-milter-discuss > |