From: Tom E. <te...@sh...> - 2012-02-29 03:42:44
|
On 2/28/12 5:23 PM, jonetsu wrote: > Hmmm.. Not sure if the other one got to you, so here it is. Sorry for > any duplicate. Here is the dump. It was done in the following way: - > unit3: reboot w/o any iptable commands applied - start continuous > pings from unit1 - unit3: shorewall start - (continuous pingings > still going on) - unit3: shorewall dump 192.168.3.2 = unit1 = pinging > unit 172.30.159.103 = unit3 = shorewall unit 172.30.159.102 = unit2 = > pinging target unit eth1 <--> fe-4-2 unit3 fe-3-1 <--> fe-3-1 eth2 In > a parallel iptables-only test it is possible to immediately stop the > pingings when iptables rules are applied by flushing the whole thing > before applying any new rules. Thanks ! So everything else, other than the Shorewall version was the same in these two tests? Kernel, iptables, iproute2, ...? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ |