Re: [Shorewall-users] Re: One NIC, filtering access

[Samer Y. A. <sam...@ho...>]

Hello

That Will InCrEaSe the load on you - Tom-, and I beleive if you invest this
time, in Shorewall dev., would be much better for all of us

Thank you

Kind Regards
Samer
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Eastep" <te...@sh...>
To: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users" <sho...@li...>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Re: One NIC, filtering access


> David T Hollis wrote:
>
> >
> > Slightly off-topic but I've been wondering - are you taking submissions
> > for additional 'standard' actions?  What is currently there certainly
> > covers a large portion of situations but some others that I've rolled
> > have been for dropping all MSSQL traffic (almost as many probes on 1433
> > these days as old CodeRed traffic!).  While I can certainly see that it
> > would be undesireable to have way too many pre-defines because it
> > becomes overwhelming and the end-admin winds up just creating their own
> > (if you've played with Checkpoint, this seems to be a very common thing
> > there).
> >
> I have given this topic a little thought and wonder if setting up
> something on the Wiki might not be the best solution. The alternative
> would be for people to send their contributions to me and I could place
> them in the mirrored shorewall/contrib directory.
>
> What do other folks think?
>
> -Tom
> -- 
> Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
> Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
> Washington USA  \ te...@sh...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Post: Sho...@li...
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
https://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
> Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm
> FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
>