From: Bertrand R. <ber...@it...> - 2002-12-20 22:35:55
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: sho...@sh... > [mailto:sho...@sh...] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep > > --On Friday, December 20, 2002 02:04:03 PM -0800 Tom Eastep > <te...@sh...> wrote: > > > --On Friday, December 20, 2002 10:54:55 PM +0100 Bertrand Renuart > > <ber...@it...> wrote: > >> > >> Both firewalls are working ok, local subnets can access the net zone, > >> etc. > >> > > Missed that the first time -- most likely indicates that the > routing in the > local subnets is correct. > > -Tom Well, I got it... You won't believe me (or maybe you will ;-) I was pinging 192.168.3.50 from 192.168.2.50, but 2.50 wasn't powered-on... I knew it, but I was expecting some trafic on the net-zone, through the VPN, and of course no answers to my pings. As I couldn't see any trafic, I thought the VPN wasn't working properly. If I start the target machine (3.50), then suddently I see packets flowing in the net zone, and I have the answers... Can you understand this ? -bertrand |