Re: [Shinken-devel] Pushing minimum Python equirement to 2.5?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
naparuba
From: Olivier H. <oli...@gm...> - 2012-07-17 06:33:31
|
Hello, I agree with pushing minimal version to 2.6. People with RHEL5 can always install python2.6 if they really want to. "Even" (ahah troll :p) debian squeeze supports python 2.6 & 2.7. Maybe we could focus on "good" (let's define good ... ) compatibility with the "last" 2 majors release of popular distro ( debian, redhat, centos, suse ... ) ? Regards Olivier 2012/7/17 David GUENAULT <dav...@gm...> > Hum, i don't think it is the responsability of the shinken project to > maintain compatibility of so old distributions. This is a real handbrake > for the development of shinken ! packaging castrated versions of shinken is > not a good solution as it does not expose the full functionalities of the > project. Shinken evolve quickly and it is one of the main interest of using > it ! We cannot stop evolution because of old distributions. This is just my > own point of view. Never forget darwin, evolution is the only way to > survive. > > > 2012/7/17 Hartmut Goebel <h.g...@cr...> > >> Am 16.07.2012 15:59, schrieb Gerhard Lausser: >> > So if there is a jump to 2.5-syntax, we have a problem with the >> > CentOS/RedHat 5.x build of OMD. (And i bet there are many, many >> production >> > systems with 5.x out there) >> >> RHEL 5 will be supported until 2017. If we really want to keep RHEL 5 >> compatibility, we'll not be able to move forward the next 5 years. >> Python 2.4 will be 13 years old then and will not have been fixed for 9 >> years. And even Python 3 will be 9 years old then. >> >> I expect the first Linux distributions switching to Python 3 the next >> two or three years. This is when it becomes rally hard, still >> maintaining Python 2.4 compatibility. >> >> I doubt, it's a good idea binding the development of an application to >> the release policy of an distribution. Esp. since it should be easy to >> prepare Python 2.7 and the few modules required by Shinken even for and >> old Linux release. >> >> > No Shinken in OMD for CentOS/RedHat 5.x which is a very bad idea (it's >> > already a castrated package because it includes no Shinken UI for these >> > versions) >> >> Yet another reason why OMD should include a recent Python version :-) >> >> -- >> Regards >> Hartmut Goebel >> >> | Hartmut Goebel | h.g...@cr... | >> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Shinken-devel mailing list >> Shi...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Shinken-devel mailing list > Shi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel > > |