You can subscribe to this list here.
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(214) |
Sep
(148) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(117) |
Dec
(220) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(106) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(99) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: William L. <xfu...@gm...> - 2011-02-02 12:39:26
|
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Matthijs ter Woord < mat...@gm...> wrote: > IL has remained unchanged since .NET 2.0. Extension methods are just > compiler metadata (1 single attribute, together with source compiler > support), LINQ are just extension methods with source compiler support, .net > 4.0 dynamic objects is all implemented using .net extension methods, so > might be something else.. > This may be true, but technically the AOT (especially in the 0.0.1 release) probably does not actually handle all normal IL operations. If the new features have caused older code which worked to expose something using any of these features, this could be the cause. One example is support for strings. I don't recall if full string support was present in 0.0.1 or not, but for a long time we had to specially craft our string constant usage to use an AOT-provided converter to an IntPtr so that strings could be used without the runtime being active. We later had much nicer string support but code like: string str = "hello world"; would typically cause an error from the AOT similiar to what you got. It certainly could be something else though. Let us know what you find out :-) Just sayin' PS: I CCed my original reply to the list and you sent a reply to that direct to the list. If you aren't already subscribed to the developers list, you will likely want to sign up from sourceforge (sharpos.sf.net). |
From: Matthijs t. W. <mat...@gm...> - 2011-02-02 07:25:15
|
IL has remained unchanged since .NET 2.0. Extension methods are just compiler metadata (1 single attribute, together with source compiler support), LINQ are just extension methods with source compiler support, .net 4.0 dynamic objects is all implemented using .net extension methods, so might be something else.. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:38 AM, William Lahti <xfu...@gm...> wrote: > Hello Darko, > > There is no guarantee that the Milestone 0.0.1 release compiles on the > latest Visual Studio. I cannot provide a detailed solution for your problem, > but from the sounds of it, you may be generating a kernel executable which > is using newer .NET features in the IL code which are not supported by the > AOT compiler. Try lowering the framework target version from the project > settings if possible. I believe we were targetting .NET 2.0 but that might > not be exactly the case. There is also newer code available in our > Subversion repository on SourceForge.net (http://sharpos.sf.net/) > > <http://sourceforge.net/projects/sharpos/files/sharpos-project/0.0.1/>Good > luck! > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Darko Juric <Dar...@fe...> wrote: > >> Dear Sir, >> >> I've tried to compile SharpOS with VS 2010 (source has been downloaded >> from sourceforge.net (zip file)) unsuccessfully. >> Two images has been made to show the error. >> Am I'm doing something wrong ? >> >> The main reason why I'm doing this is that I would (maybe) enroll a >> subject named "Embedded OS-es" which is dealing with building operating >> systems from entry-level and I'm considering as an option to use C# and AOT >> as tools for accomplishing this. >> >> But it would be great if I could first compile it... :) >> ...and sorry for my bad English >> >> Thank You >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better > price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > > |
From: William L. <xfu...@gm...> - 2011-02-02 00:38:26
|
Hello Darko, There is no guarantee that the Milestone 0.0.1 release compiles on the latest Visual Studio. I cannot provide a detailed solution for your problem, but from the sounds of it, you may be generating a kernel executable which is using newer .NET features in the IL code which are not supported by the AOT compiler. Try lowering the framework target version from the project settings if possible. I believe we were targetting .NET 2.0 but that might not be exactly the case. There is also newer code available in our Subversion repository on SourceForge.net (http://sharpos.sf.net/) <http://sourceforge.net/projects/sharpos/files/sharpos-project/0.0.1/>Good luck! On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Darko Juric <Dar...@fe...> wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I've tried to compile SharpOS with VS 2010 (source has been downloaded > from sourceforge.net (zip file)) unsuccessfully. > Two images has been made to show the error. > Am I'm doing something wrong ? > > The main reason why I'm doing this is that I would (maybe) enroll a > subject named "Embedded OS-es" which is dealing with building operating > systems from entry-level and I'm considering as an option to use C# and AOT > as tools for accomplishing this. > > But it would be great if I could first compile it... :) > ...and sorry for my bad English > > Thank You > |
From: Phil G. <ph...@th...> - 2010-11-18 01:53:23
|
SharpOS project has been inactive for over two years. Some of the SharpOS developers have moved to the MOSA Project (www.mosa-project.org) to develop a .NET compiler, OS kernel and device drivers, all written in C#. The MOSA developers hang out on freenode.com in the #mosa room. I don't know if the SharpOS project will become active again, or simply merge with the MOSA Project. But either way, there is still monument for a managed Operating System based on .NET. Phil On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:28 PM, iozk hz <io...@gm...> wrote: > hi i want to contribute in the sharpos my knowledge in the C# language is > 80% and i want know how works this because doesnt have documentation and i > tinkk that this OS will be great like some windows making the diferense for > that i want contribute > > thanks! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today > http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > > |
From: JaeHyun R. <wo...@gm...> - 2010-11-17 05:11:21
|
Maybe you need to do that for yourself. Cause this project is hold for now. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM, iozk hz <io...@gm...> wrote: > hi i want to contribute in the sharpos my knowledge in the C# language is > 80% and i want know how works this because doesnt have documentation and i > tinkk that this OS will be great like some windows making the diferense for > that i want contribute > > thanks! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today > http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > > -- -- Web Page : http://www.osguru.net Blog : http://wonbear.egloos.com |
From: iozk hz <io...@gm...> - 2010-11-17 03:28:55
|
hi i want to contribute in the sharpos my knowledge in the C# language is 80% and i want know how works this because doesnt have documentation and i tinkk that this OS will be great like some windows making the diferense for that i want contribute thanks! |
From: Phil G. <ph...@th...> - 2009-07-24 15:22:42
|
The next MOSA meeting is tomorrow, July 25th at 9am PST/11am MST/12pm(noon) EST/6pm DST on IRC channel #mosa on irc.freenode.net. The proposed agenda is: 1. Initial 0.1 Release Conditions - What's still missing and left to do? - What's next? 2. Linux Support - Nant build system - Gallio is not available for Linux. Move to Nunit? 3. Mono corelib Support - Compile Mono from source - Submit patches to Mono for "managed" implementations 4. MOSA Operating System - Continue being "just" a framework? 5. Open Discussion |
From: William L. <xfu...@gm...> - 2009-07-23 20:40:35
|
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Jonathan Moore <jon...@bv...>wrote: > I was wondering how to create a new image file (.img) with a new build > I’ve made and do I need grub? > The process is automated nicely via nant, I think it's "nant dist". Otherwise, the Tools/DiskImageUpdater directory contains a program which can update the .img with the kernel. The template disk image is located in Data/DiskImages/TemplateDisk.img or something. Hope this helps, it's been a long time since I've done a build on it. Let me know if you need any more help! -- rezonant long name: William Lahti handle :: rezonant freenode :: xfury blog :: http://xfurious.blogspot.com/ site :: http://komodocorp.com/~wilahti |
From: Jonathan M. <jon...@bv...> - 2009-07-23 15:14:03
|
When I try to compile SharpOS with nant with the command `nant dist' I get the following error: [exec] Error: SharpOS.AOT.IR.NotImplementedEngineException: Not Implemented yet. when trying to create the .bin file. Please help. Thanks Jonathan |
From: Jonathan M. <jon...@bv...> - 2009-07-23 02:08:06
|
I was wondering how to create a new image file (.img) with a new build I've made and do I need grub? Thanks Jonathan |
From: Jonathan M. <jon...@bv...> - 2009-07-23 02:08:06
|
I was wondering how to create a new image file (.img) with a new build I've made and do I need grub? Thanks Jonathan |
From: Bruce M. <ill...@gm...> - 2009-02-24 13:12:42
|
There is often conversations occuring over in #mosa (freenode). tgiphil , grover , and rootnode have been working on the compiler and stuff for a while. Within the last couple weeks I've been digging into the compiler as well. (Trying to get unit tests to pass, etc.) Its really cool stuff, you should come over and check it when you have the chance. |
From: Sander v. R. <san...@gm...> - 2009-02-24 06:59:49
|
So guys, how's it going with MOSA? It's been eerily quiet on the mailing list.. (perhaps I'm on the wrong mailing list?) |
From: Phil G. <sh...@th...> - 2009-02-20 16:15:18
|
Same here. Interesting stuff! On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Bruce Markham <ill...@gm...> wrote: > I've actually been following that guy's blog for a month or two, it's > friggin awesome... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > > |
From: Bruce M. <ill...@gm...> - 2009-02-20 13:22:03
|
I've actually been following that guy's blog for a month or two, it's friggin awesome... |
From: Sander v. R. <s.v...@sy...> - 2009-02-20 09:29:52
|
FYI: here's a link to a blog with a lot of interesting details about low level OS functionality.. http://duartes.org/gustavo/blog Cheers |
From: Bruce M. <ill...@gm...> - 2009-01-20 22:39:30
|
Attention Fellow SharpOS Developers and Board Members: I got Will Lahti (xfury, one of the board here, for those that are scratching their heads and trying to remember what SharpOS is) to contact Dreamhost and fix our httpd.conf so that we can use the site. I've gone ahead and setup DokuWiki ( http://www.sharpos.org/ , like always) because it is lightweight and appears to be running well. If you want to add content to it, you'll need to register yourself, and then contact me directly so I can mark you with permissions to edit pages. SharpOS Board Members that contact me will be given full administrative ability. The system does *NOT* include an issue tracker. And I personally do not have the means or the time to attempt to retrieve data from what I believe is a MySQL database that Redmine was using. So this is going to be fresh content only. I will try to get some sort of issue tracking software running * eventually*. Any of the other board members are also welcome to spend some time on this. Over the next few days I will be fleshing out the wiki to cover some of the basics of getting involved with the project. I'm also advertising our affiliation with MOSA. I think it needs to be clarified, and clear, that SharpOS is only on deferral until MOSA reaches further milestones. SharpOS' momentum was proving the concept, and with an AOT that we are incapable of maintaining, we are stuck in a sticky mess. But that doesn't mean that we can't move the community forward. And then after MOSA has made the strides for SharpOS to pick back up, perhaps that is where the focus will go back to at that point. I'll also be changing the topic in the IRC channel to direct people here. Thanks for your attention, folks, and hang in there. -Bruce Markham aka illuminus |
From: William L. <xfu...@gm...> - 2008-12-14 20:42:19
|
We had a lot of troubles with redmine consuming too much CPU on our meager hosting setup, and I believe the hosting admins had to pull it down (as of now I get some httpd related error). I think we will need a replacement system... In the short term I think I'll set up a normal wiki and port over the redmine wiki from there, so that sharpos.org isnt totally inaccessible. We still have all of the redmine data and everything. Keep in mind it seems few of us have time to devote to this project right now, so it may be some time before we have an actual redmine replacement. -- fury long name: William Lahti handle :: fury freenode :: xfury blog :: http://xfurious.blogspot.com/ |
From: Jonathan C D. <jon...@gm...> - 2008-10-15 04:10:18
|
Much obliged. Makes a really good read, it doesn't save us from vertical hinting though. I wil try something new, I will try to render the font at 400 DPI regardless and forget about hinting. -----Original Message----- From: Sander van Rossen <s.v...@sy...> Sent: 14 October 2008 07:53 PM To: sha...@li... Subject: [SharpOS Developers] An interesting link about font rendering For those who are interested: http://www.antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/index.html#FONT_RASTERIZATION Cheers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list Sha...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers |
From: Sander v. R. <s.v...@sy...> - 2008-10-14 17:53:29
|
For those who are interested: http://www.antigrain.com/research/font_rasterization/index.html#FONT_RASTERIZATION Cheers |
From: Adam S. <a.l...@gm...> - 2008-10-04 22:54:07
|
Thanks for the SVN stuff! :) That can be some really valuable stuff down the road for the project. -Adam On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:26 AM, psa...@co... < psa...@co...> wrote: > Hi there, > > > Which one are the "obvious reasons" to look into SVN? :-) > > > pablo > > Jonathan Chayce Dickinson escribió: > > Hi All, > > I have also started fooling around with the SVN protocol (for obvious > > reasons :)). I have made a few classes that serialize/deserialize SVN > > packets, and they are attached. > > They don't perform any validation, but with a proper server (like SVN > > itself) it should work fine. > > Does anyone have docs on the 'format' of working copies (I think the > > FSFS system, as that is most popular). > > Jonathan > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > > Sha...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > |
From: <psa...@co...> - 2008-10-02 14:43:10
|
Hi there, Which one are the "obvious reasons" to look into SVN? :-) pablo Jonathan Chayce Dickinson escribió: > Hi All, > I have also started fooling around with the SVN protocol (for obvious > reasons :)). I have made a few classes that serialize/deserialize SVN > packets, and they are attached. > They don't perform any validation, but with a proper server (like SVN > itself) it should work fine. > Does anyone have docs on the 'format' of working copies (I think the > FSFS system, as that is most popular). > Jonathan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers |
From: grover <sh...@mi...> - 2008-10-01 16:23:30
|
No problem and good luck. I just today turned my thesis in :) Maybe you'd like to attend the MOSA meeting on Saturday - I think we could put down a roadmap for the next actions there, which would involve a scheduler/synchronization primitives too. Mike > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dennis Gronewold [mailto:dgr...@ar...] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2008 17:05 > An: sha...@li... > Betreff: Re: [SharpOS Developers] Introduction and questions > > Michael, Phil, > > sorry for the late reply. > > I've ditched the idea to test blocking with the floppy driver etc. > Instead I've been working on getting several consoles running > in their own threads and block them on waiting for keyboard > input. This seems to work well enough for now. > As for implementing a scheduler within the MOSA framework: I > would be interested in that, but that'll probably have to > wait until I finish my thesis in November. > In meantime I'll probably ask some more questions about how > some stuff works ;-) > > Dennis > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move > Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based > applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize > is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > Sha...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > |
From: Dennis G. <dgr...@ar...> - 2008-10-01 15:05:12
|
Michael, Phil, sorry for the late reply. I've ditched the idea to test blocking with the floppy driver etc. Instead I've been working on getting several consoles running in their own threads and block them on waiting for keyboard input. This seems to work well enough for now. As for implementing a scheduler within the MOSA framework: I would be interested in that, but that'll probably have to wait until I finish my thesis in November. In meantime I'll probably ask some more questions about how some stuff works ;-) Dennis |
From: Jonathan D. <jon...@gm...> - 2008-09-25 14:36:08
|
I also reached that stage a while back. Unfortunately, it seems as though the best method is caching the glyphs. Wpf and windows do that, and I would assume freetype and the linux libraries do that as well. Although... When it comes to fitting and hinting I don't think cached glyphs could be used as-is. Hmmm. Sounds like fun, maybe I will have a crack at it. The benefits of machine execution probably outweigh the benefits of caching by a lot, especially when it comes to memory usage. Tweaking existing paths is also probably expensive. You could generate the ttf assembly when the ttf is 'installed', and be over with ttf monstrosities (those guys belong in a zoo where we can feed them true type bananas). Different font codecs (opentype, bitmap FONs, etc) would simply take an input stream and provide an assembly that implements well known interfaces. Thanks for iterating that thought process again Sander! Ttf is fun once again! -----Original Message----- From: Sander van Rossen <s.v...@sy...> Sent: 25 September 2008 09:16 AM To: sha...@li... Subject: Re: [SharpOS Developers] Freetype You know, i think eventually we should translate truetype directly to msil (and JIT compile it when we're able to).. should be good performance wise ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list Sha...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers |