From: Raving <sto...@sw...> - 2007-05-14 14:48:24
|
A new question occurred to me today, based on a peripheral comment at = http://ontoworld.org/wiki/Talk:N-ary_relations . (I post there as = Stormraven.) Let's say I have a lengthy article about a prominent person; the talk = page uses Ronald Reagan for various examples. And within that article = there is a section that's lengthy enough to break out into its own = article, such as "Presidency of Ronald Reagan." Now, within that = article there might be several relations that properly take Ronald = Reagan as the subject, but now that they're in the new article, they = take Presidency of Ronald Reagan as the subject, like "friend of" --> = Margaret Thatcher or "left office on date" --> January 20, 1989. These relations are now misplaced. To solve the problem, I could use = common, non-annotated links in the "Presidency of Ronald Reagan" article = and put the relations back into the Ronald Reagan article, but they'd be = empty-piped links (such as [[friend of::Margaret Thatcher| ]] ) because = they don't relate to any links or other text remaining in the article. = And there'd probably be a lot of them, a whole cluster of empty-piped = links related to information no longer contained in the article. Or I = can leave them in the new article, leading to the semantic = interpretation that the presidency of Ronald Reagan left office in 1989 = (which almost makes sense) and that Lady Thatcher was a friend of the = presidency of Ronald Reagan (which really doesn't make much sense at = all). Is there a way to redirect relations to their proper subjects in such a = situation? Wes |