From: Johann D. <mo...@bl...> - 2005-12-09 23:37:21
|
I'm not sure about this - Wikipedia has already a very powerfull mechanism for eliminating copyright-abuse: -- Peer-Review If someone sees such a thing, he can mark it and solve the problem as fast as sending an e-mail. Warnings by lawers are senseless, because a simple delete of the article while marking it as copyright-abuse is cheap and easy. True, it's not possible to avoid copyright-abuse at all - but the response time to such things is very low. At least better than many other techniques. MovGP0 > > If I understand this correctly, this law - especially with > the amendment proposed by the industry - is absulutely ridiculous! > > This law only makes some kind of sense when interpreted in > terms of "Any software that is suited to disable copyright > mechanisms" or similar. > > > Now, obviously, any wiki can be used to publish copyrighted > material, > > Sure, but if they would really take it that strict, they > woult have to ban all eMail clients and servers too. > And FTP-Software. And the Apache web server aswell. > And telephones. Because you could still play a copyrighted > song over a telephone. > > This law is - in it's strict sense - practically unobeyable. > > Or did I get something wrong there? > > How is the common practice on laws like this in France? > Would Wiki devellopers really have to fear getting sued, as > long as they don't include special DRM removal features? > > > Cheers - Heiko *uncomprehendingly shaking his head on the > crazyness of laws like this and the world in general* %-) > -- > Heiko Haller > Institut AIFB, Uni Karlsruhe (TH) > http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/hha/ > > > > |