#216 Bug Fix #2252

None
closed
None
5
2014-02-12
2014-02-12
Ben Shi
No

This is due to mistreat 0xff as -1, actually 0xffff is.

in line 3291, sdcc/src/stm8/gen.c

1 Attachments

Discussion

  • Ben Shi
    Ben Shi
    2014-02-12

    Sorry, in line 3294, not 3291, change the last parameter 0x00ff to 0xffff ( 16-bit minus one).

     
  • No problem. I already noticed and fixed it; the fix will be comitted later today. Currently I'm running the regression tests for the other ports, to check if any other port is broken in a similar way.

    Philipp

     
    • status: open --> closed
    • assigned_to: Philipp Klaus Krause
    • Group: -->
     
  • Bug #2252 has been fixed.

    Philipp