From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-10-15 15:48:52
|
Dear sdcc users and developers, in order to unify the sdcc toolchain utility prefixes to "sd*" I propose to rename "asranlib" to "sdranlib". I don't have an idea how many of you are using "ar" format libraries with the "asranlib" utility and what would such a (cosmetic) change mean for you (updating Makefiles and project files, ...). So I'm referring to you asking for the feedback. For the future (probably after the sdcc 3.1.0 releas) I plan to implement a librarian ("sdar" or "sdlib"), since sdcc is currently using the "system ar" librarian. My current idea is to base it on the "gplib" implementation from gputils suite, written by Craig Franklin. Any suggestions are welcome! Borut |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-10-25 17:51:31
|
I haven't received any complain, so I'm going to rename "asranlib" to "sdranlib". Borut On 10/15/2011 05:48 PM, Borut Ražem wrote: > Dear sdcc users and developers, > > in order to unify the sdcc toolchain utility prefixes to "sd*" I > propose to rename "asranlib" to "sdranlib". > > I don't have an idea how many of you are using "ar" format libraries > with the "asranlib" utility and what would such a (cosmetic) change > mean for you (updating Makefiles and project files, ...). > > So I'm referring to you asking for the feedback. > > For the future (probably after the sdcc 3.1.0 releas) I plan to > implement a librarian ("sdar" or "sdlib"), since sdcc is currently > using the "system ar" librarian. My current idea is to base it on the > "gplib" implementation from gputils suite, written by Craig Franklin. > Any suggestions are welcome! > > Borut |