From: Strobl A. <a.s...@aw...> - 2011-09-14 16:41:27
|
Dear Philipp, a month ago I wrote gputils developer a feature request to release gputils in version 0.13.8: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 See marco's answer below: Regards, Strobl Anton ----- Nachricht von no...@so... --------- Datum: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:32:51 +0300 Von: "SourceForge.net" <no...@so...> Betreff: [ gputils-Feature Requests-3387146 ] release 0.13.8 (virus scanned) An: "SourceForge.net" <no...@so...> > Feature Requests item #3387146, was opened at 2011-08-06 13:16 > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kohtala > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 > > Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, > including the initial issue submission, for this request, > not just the latest update. > Category: None > Group: None > Status: Open > Priority: 5 > Private: No > Submitted By: strobla (awsit) > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Summary: release 0.13.8 > > Initial Comment: > Dear Marco, dear gputils developers, > > would it be possible for you to release a gputils 0.13.8 version to > allow sdcc project to support new pic family 18f2xk22 / 18f4xk22? > > Thank you and best regards, Strobl Anton > > P.S.: see email from Borut Ražem <borut.razem AT gmail DOT com> sent > to gnupic <gnupic AT linuxhacker DOT org> sent on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 : > >> Hi gputils developers, >> >> sdcc now supports pic 18f2xk22/pic18f4xk22 devices, which are not >> supported by the latest gputils-0.13.7, but they are already in the >> gputils svn. Is there any chance to release gputils-0.13.8, so that >> upcoming sdcc 3.1 release will depend on officially released gputils >> version? >> >> Borut > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Comment By: Marko Kohtala (kohtala) > Date: 2011-09-13 15:32 > > Message: > Sorry to keep you waiting for reply. > > I have not done a single release, simply contributed to the code. Maybe > committed a few patches. > > Other things have priority in my life, so taking this new task of making a > release is not a possibility for me for some time to come. > > I think there are bugs in some of the new parts support. Mostly with the > new instruction set. I had a little time some time ago to start on test > cases to go through all new and old instructions and the new parts, but did > not get to finish it. I'd love to get those tested and fixed before a > release. > > This could use some volunteers. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 > > ----- Ende der Nachricht von no...@so... ----- |
From: Raphael N. <rn...@we...> - 2011-09-15 10:20:12
|
Hi, > How about a configure switch that allows to disable support for the new > pics, thus allowing sdcc to be built with current gputils release? I will look into this. Raphael |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-09-16 16:34:03
|
Am 16.09.2011 11:18, schrieb Borut Razem: > For those not following the gputils mailing list: […] Where can I find this mailing list? According to http://gputils.sourceforge.net it is gn...@li... and the archive says that there has been no traffic this month. Philipp |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-09-17 08:09:21
|
Philipp, the miling list is correct and there is relly not much activity lately. I actually forwarded the bug tracker notification. Borut On 16 Sep 2011 19:34, "Philipp Klaus Krause" <pk...@sp...> wrote: > Am 16.09.2011 11:18, schrieb Borut Razem: >> For those not following the gputils mailing list: […] > > Where can I find this mailing list? According to > http://gputils.sourceforge.net it is gn...@li... and the > archive says that there has been no traffic this month. > > Philipp > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Raphael N. <rn...@we...> - 2011-09-18 23:26:41
|
>> How about a configure switch that allows to disable support for the new >> pics, thus allowing sdcc to be built with current gputils release? > > I will look into this. I just added a --enable-new-pics configure option which includes 18f[24][3456]k22 devices in the device and I/O library build processes. When not given, libraries for these devices are not built, thus reenabling building SDCC with the current gputils 0.13.7 release. @Borut: The compile farm machines use custom-built gputils from recent SVN sources, so specifying --enable-new-pics should work (and is recommended). Could you please modify the build scripts accordingly? I added --enable-new-pics to the configure scripts in device/lib/pic16/ and device/non-free/lib/pic16/, so one needs to use configure --help=recursive to see the new options. However, they are/it is also documented in sdccman.lyx Raphael |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-09-15 09:02:19
|
Am 14.09.2011 18:08, schrieb Strobl Anton: > Dear Philipp, > > a month ago I wrote gputils developer a feature request to release > gputils in version 0.13.8: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 > > See marco's answer below: > > […] >> Other things have priority in my life, so taking this new task of making a >> release is not a possibility for me for some time to come. How about a configure switch that allows to disable support for the new pics, thus allowing sdcc to be built with current gputils release? I don't think distributions will be willing to package sdcc 3.1 if that introduces a build-dependency on an unreleased gputils version. Philipp |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-09-19 08:35:22
|
Currently I am on vacatios, busy waiting for gputils developers replies about the proposed release ;-) , so it is a little bit dificult to make svn commits. I'll do it next week when I'll be back. OTOH the configure switch won't be needed if the gputils will be released before sdcc. But it can be usefull in the future, if / when we will have a similar situation. Greetings from Grece, Borut On 19 Sep 2011 02:26, "Raphael Neider" <rn...@we...> wrote: >>> How about a configure switch that allows to disable support for the new >>> pics, thus allowing sdcc to be built with current gputils release? >> >> I will look into this. > > I just added a --enable-new-pics configure option which includes > 18f[24][3456]k22 devices in the device and I/O library build processes. > When not given, libraries for these devices are not built, thus reenabling > building SDCC with the current gputils 0.13.7 release. > > @Borut: The compile farm machines use custom-built gputils from recent SVN > sources, so specifying --enable-new-pics should work (and is recommended). > Could you please modify the build scripts accordingly? > > I added --enable-new-pics to the configure scripts in device/lib/pic16/ > and device/non-free/lib/pic16/, so one needs to use > configure --help=recursive > to see the new options. However, they are/it is also documented in > sdccman.lyx > > > Raphael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-09-19 09:38:00
|
Am 19.09.2011 10:35, schrieb Borut Ražem: > Currently I am on vacatios, busy waiting for gputils developers replies > about the proposed release ;-) , so it is a little bit dificult to make > svn commits. I'll do it next week when I'll be back. > > OTOH the configure switch won't be needed if the gputils will be > released before sdcc. But it can be usefull in the future, if / when we > will have a similar situation. Well, it's useful for anyone wanting to compile sdcc from source that doesn't need support for the latest pics: It reduces the effort to compile and use the latest sdcc revision. Philipp |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-09-16 09:18:15
|
For those not following the gputils mailing list: I added the following proposal: ----8<---- What about making a compromise: just taking the gputils-0.13.7 package, add the 18f2xk22/pic18f4xk22 support and declare it as gputils-0.13.8 release? I'll wait 1 week for answers / comments, after that I'll start preparing the release (since I'm gputils developer too ;-). So if you don't agree with the proposal, please let me know ASAP! Borut ---->8---- On 09/14/2011 06:08 PM, Strobl Anton wrote: > Dear Philipp, > > a month ago I wrote gputils developer a feature request to release > gputils in version 0.13.8: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 > > See marco's answer below: > > Regards, Strobl Anton > > ----- Nachricht von no...@so... --------- > Datum: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:32:51 +0300 > Von: "SourceForge.net"<no...@so...> > Betreff: [ gputils-Feature Requests-3387146 ] release 0.13.8 > (virus scanned) > An: "SourceForge.net"<no...@so...> > > >> Feature Requests item #3387146, was opened at 2011-08-06 13:16 >> Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kohtala >> You can respond by visiting: >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 >> >> Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, >> including the initial issue submission, for this request, >> not just the latest update. >> Category: None >> Group: None >> Status: Open >> Priority: 5 >> Private: No >> Submitted By: strobla (awsit) >> Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >> Summary: release 0.13.8 >> >> Initial Comment: >> Dear Marco, dear gputils developers, >> >> would it be possible for you to release a gputils 0.13.8 version to >> allow sdcc project to support new pic family 18f2xk22 / 18f4xk22? >> >> Thank you and best regards, Strobl Anton >> >> P.S.: see email from Borut Ražem<borut.razem AT gmail DOT com> sent >> to gnupic<gnupic AT linuxhacker DOT org> sent on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 : >> >>> Hi gputils developers, >>> >>> sdcc now supports pic 18f2xk22/pic18f4xk22 devices, which are not >>> supported by the latest gputils-0.13.7, but they are already in the >>> gputils svn. Is there any chance to release gputils-0.13.8, so that >>> upcoming sdcc 3.1 release will depend on officially released gputils >>> version? >>> >>> Borut >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> Comment By: Marko Kohtala (kohtala) >> Date: 2011-09-13 15:32 >> >> Message: >> Sorry to keep you waiting for reply. >> >> I have not done a single release, simply contributed to the code. Maybe >> committed a few patches. >> >> Other things have priority in my life, so taking this new task of making a >> release is not a possibility for me for some time to come. >> >> I think there are bugs in some of the new parts support. Mostly with the >> new instruction set. I had a little time some time ago to start on test >> cases to go through all new and old instructions and the new parts, but did >> not get to finish it. I'd love to get those tested and fixed before a >> release. >> >> This could use some volunteers. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> You can respond by visiting: >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=431668&aid=3387146&group_id=41924 |