From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-07-04 09:45:33
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 13:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by dfulab You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-09-11 07:46:48
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 19:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by borutr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 09:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-03-11 21:41:24
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by b-s-a You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: b-s-a (b-s-a) Date: 2012-03-11 14:41 Message: Moreother, this suggestion provides way to assign values to registers before inline assembler execution (for example, as in gcc), registers to output value after execution and information about used registers in the assembler block. Currently, I do not see any way to do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 00:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-03-18 12:35:16
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by borutr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) >Assigned to: Borut Ražem (borutr) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-18 05:35 Message: asm () and __asm__ () implemented in svn revision #7462. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: b-s-a (b-s-a) Date: 2012-03-11 14:41 Message: Moreother, this suggestion provides way to assign values to registers before inline assembler execution (for example, as in gcc), registers to output value after execution and information about used registers in the assembler block. Currently, I do not see any way to do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 00:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-03-19 17:58:22
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by spth You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Borut Ražem (borutr) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Philipp Klaus Krause (spth) Date: 2012-03-19 10:58 Message: Well, even though there noe is __asm__() (and asm(), which I hipe will go away again), I think that the '-issue with the old approach should be fixed, if it still exists. We manage to ignore a stray ' in comments or #if 0, so it should be possible for __asm, __endasm, too. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-18 05:35 Message: asm () and __asm__ () implemented in svn revision #7462. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: b-s-a (b-s-a) Date: 2012-03-11 14:41 Message: Moreother, this suggestion provides way to assign values to registers before inline assembler execution (for example, as in gcc), registers to output value after execution and information about used registers in the assembler block. Currently, I do not see any way to do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 00:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-03-19 20:19:18
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by borutr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Borut Ražem (borutr) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-19 13:19 Message: #pragma preproc_asm - solves the '-issue. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Klaus Krause (spth) Date: 2012-03-19 10:58 Message: Well, even though there noe is __asm__() (and asm(), which I hipe will go away again), I think that the '-issue with the old approach should be fixed, if it still exists. We manage to ignore a stray ' in comments or #if 0, so it should be possible for __asm, __endasm, too. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-18 05:35 Message: asm () and __asm__ () implemented in svn revision #7462. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: b-s-a (b-s-a) Date: 2012-03-11 14:41 Message: Moreother, this suggestion provides way to assign values to registers before inline assembler execution (for example, as in gcc), registers to output value after execution and information about used registers in the assembler block. Currently, I do not see any way to do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 00:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-03-19 20:38:11
|
Feature Requests item #2815320, was opened at 2009-07-01 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by borutr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dfulab (dfulab) Assigned to: Borut Ražem (borutr) Summary: please add asm() pseudo function as alternate Initial Comment: Is it possible to add the asm() as an alternate to _asm _endasm? The reason why I am asking is that _asm and _endasm seems to be doing a lot of unnecessary processing that so far causes bugs in my embedded assembly code. I would like to see one that treats the embedded as a string and simply paste it into the assembly file without any processing. Since it doesn't make sense to alter the behavior of existing feature, this would be an alternative. Bugs I have caught so far for Z80 version: - assembly comments contains ! causes internal error (resolved) - ex af,af' - that extra ' is part of a valid operand, but causes an error because the compiler thinks it is an unclosed ' ' quote. I had to use a .db with the right values to trick the compiler into putting the right code. - multi-line #define macro issues all lumped into the same line. If you are not careful, this can cause serious issues. A simple ; comment can turn every assembly code after it into comments. The following is taken from ez80 port from freertos project. This makes the assembly listing easier to read instead of a clump of text all squeezed into a single line. Also funny stuff like the ex af,af' won't cause grief and eliminates any potential compiler induced bug cause by its own processing. #define portSAVE_CONTEXT() \ asm ( "xref _pxCurrentTCB \n\t" \ "di \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "in0 a, (62h) \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "push iy \n\t" \ "ex af, af' \n\t" \ "exx \n\t" \ "push af \n\t" \ "push bc \n\t" \ "push de \n\t" \ "push hl \n\t" \ "ld ix, 0 \n\t" \ "add ix, sp \n\t" \ "ld hl, (_pxCurrentTCB) \n\t" \ "ld (hl), ix \n\t" \ ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-19 13:38 Message: asm() removed in svn revision #7471. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-19 13:19 Message: #pragma preproc_asm - solves the '-issue. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Klaus Krause (spth) Date: 2012-03-19 10:58 Message: Well, even though there noe is __asm__() (and asm(), which I hipe will go away again), I think that the '-issue with the old approach should be fixed, if it still exists. We manage to ignore a stray ' in comments or #if 0, so it should be possible for __asm, __endasm, too. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2012-03-18 05:35 Message: asm () and __asm__ () implemented in svn revision #7462. Borut ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: b-s-a (b-s-a) Date: 2012-03-11 14:41 Message: Moreother, this suggestion provides way to assign values to registers before inline assembler execution (for example, as in gcc), registers to output value after execution and information about used registers in the assembler block. Currently, I do not see any way to do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Borut Ražem (borutr) Date: 2011-09-11 00:46 Message: See related discussion at http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/forums/forum/1864/topic/4694974 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350599&aid=2815320&group_id=599 |