From: Frieder F. <Fri...@we...> - 2004-10-25 18:17:23
|
Hi Martin, I disabled peepholes 259.a,b. The problem is that peepholes 250.x add a reference to a previously unused label. As this does not increase the corresponding labelRefCount this leads to peepholes 259.x being (mistakenly) applied. Currently there is no way for peephole rules to increase/decrease the labelRefCount so 250.x or 259.x are mutually exclusive. Sorry for the inconvenience caused! > ! Martin Helmling, Einsteinstra=DFe 11, D 68519 Viernheim You=B4re living in bicycle distance to me!) Greetings, Frieder =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/=3Fmc=3D021201 |