From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-06-28 08:01:07
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear sdcc developers, how about a release this summer? As can be seen on http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release we do have some new features, and we sure have a load of bugfixes. IMO enough to justify making another release, especially since the 3.0 release was rather buggy, at least for the Z80 port. I have some further ideas about how to use tree-decompositions in the backends, but I'd like to see the new allocator released (and thus some more bugs in it found) first instead of dropping it all on the users at once. Philipp P.S.: The "SDCC 3.1 Tasks" list is mostly just the "SDCC 3.0 tasks" list copied over with the items marked as "DONE" omitted. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4JmEwACgkQbtUV+xsoLpobpwCeKDG9Eiwih9kZCYw1O0zM9rry 5kgAniHRLRLgMrq+JXj62Ku/TOtxSjGr =uIJb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2011-06-28 08:24:59
|
Hi Philipp, I like that idea. But I also started to move the linker to version 5 and this is not done yet. It also has introduced a bug as can be seen in the bugtracker. I think this needs some more work before the release is made. Maarten > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dear sdcc developers, > > how about a release this summer? > As can be seen on > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release we do > have some new features, and we sure have a load of bugfixes. IMO enough > to justify making another release, especially since the 3.0 release was > rather buggy, at least for the Z80 port. > > I have some further ideas about how to use tree-decompositions in the > backends, but I'd like to see the new allocator released (and thus some > more bugs in it found) first instead of dropping it all on the users at > once. > > Philipp > > P.S.: The "SDCC 3.1 Tasks" list is mostly just the "SDCC 3.0 tasks" list > copied over with the items marked as "DONE" omitted. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk4JmEwACgkQbtUV+xsoLpobpwCeKDG9Eiwih9kZCYw1O0zM9rry > 5kgAniHRLRLgMrq+JXj62Ku/TOtxSjGr > =uIJb > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > > |
From: Borut R. <bor...@gm...> - 2011-06-28 12:16:40
|
I agree that we should start the discussion about the new release. I don't have any plans for adding new functionality. Normally we tend to keep the number of open bugs below 100 for the release. The current number is 110, so we have to do some bug fixing. Borut On 06/28/2011 10:24 AM, Maarten Brock wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > I like that idea. But I also started to move the linker to version 5 and > this is not done yet. It also has introduced a bug as can be seen in the > bugtracker. I think this needs some more work before the release is made. > > Maarten > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Dear sdcc developers, >> >> how about a release this summer? >> As can be seen on >> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release we do >> have some new features, and we sure have a load of bugfixes. IMO enough >> to justify making another release, especially since the 3.0 release was >> rather buggy, at least for the Z80 port. >> >> I have some further ideas about how to use tree-decompositions in the >> backends, but I'd like to see the new allocator released (and thus some >> more bugs in it found) first instead of dropping it all on the users at >> once. >> >> Philipp >> >> P.S.: The "SDCC 3.1 Tasks" list is mostly just the "SDCC 3.0 tasks" list >> copied over with the items marked as "DONE" omitted. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAk4JmEwACgkQbtUV+xsoLpobpwCeKDG9Eiwih9kZCYw1O0zM9rry >> 5kgAniHRLRLgMrq+JXj62Ku/TOtxSjGr >> =uIJb >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. >> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security >> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 >> _______________________________________________ >> sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > |
From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2011-06-28 13:58:15
|
Hi, Though it is nice to have less than 100 open bugs, I think it starts to become important to also look at the category. Many bugs are for the non-stable pic14 and pic16 targets and I have the feeling their percentage has been growing. If only we could add the category to the visible columns in the tracker system... Maarten > I agree that we should start the discussion about the new release. I > don't have any plans for adding new functionality. > > Normally we tend to keep the number of open bugs below 100 for the > release. The current number is 110, so we have to do some bug fixing. > > Borut > > On 06/28/2011 10:24 AM, Maarten Brock wrote: >> Hi Philipp, >> >> I like that idea. But I also started to move the linker to version 5 and >> this is not done yet. It also has introduced a bug as can be seen in the >> bugtracker. I think this needs some more work before the release is >> made. >> >> Maarten >> >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Dear sdcc developers, >>> >>> how about a release this summer? >>> As can be seen on >>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release we do >>> have some new features, and we sure have a load of bugfixes. IMO enough >>> to justify making another release, especially since the 3.0 release was >>> rather buggy, at least for the Z80 port. >>> >>> I have some further ideas about how to use tree-decompositions in the >>> backends, but I'd like to see the new allocator released (and thus some >>> more bugs in it found) first instead of dropping it all on the users at >>> once. >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> P.S.: The "SDCC 3.1 Tasks" list is mostly just the "SDCC 3.0 tasks" >>> list >>> copied over with the items marked as "DONE" omitted. >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAk4JmEwACgkQbtUV+xsoLpobpwCeKDG9Eiwih9kZCYw1O0zM9rry >>> 5kgAniHRLRLgMrq+JXj62Ku/TOtxSjGr >>> =uIJb >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously >>> valuable. >>> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, >>> security >>> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and >>> makes >>> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sdcc-devel mailing list >>> sdc...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously >> valuable. >> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, >> security >> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 >> _______________________________________________ >> sdcc-devel mailing list >> sdc...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 > _______________________________________________ > sdcc-devel mailing list > sdc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel > > |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-06-28 16:11:48
|
Am 28.06.2011 15:58, schrieb Maarten Brock: > Hi, > > Though it is nice to have less than 100 open bugs, I think it starts to > become important to also look at the category. Many bugs are for the > non-stable pic14 and pic16 targets and I have the feeling their percentage > has been growing. 54 out of the currently open 108 bugs ore PIC bugs. > If only we could add the category to the visible columns > in the tracker system... I often wished for that as well. Philipp |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2011-08-15 20:32:21
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 28.06.2011 10:24, schrieb Maarten Brock: > Hi Philipp, > > I like that idea. But I also started to move the linker to version 5 and > this is not done yet. It also has introduced a bug as can be seen in the > bugtracker. I think this needs some more work before the release is made. > > Maarten What's the current situation with the linker? Are there any other issues (other than too many open bugs and the items on http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release) that need to be resolved before a release? Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5JgkIACgkQbtUV+xsoLpqr3wCgxb+t6R+Rk9wuQZkTLhTE+2hB oXAAoIDmpCJ3XchAFD6phe0BZh+8IHzV =Lfa5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2011-08-16 21:09:53
|
Hi, > Am 28.06.2011 10:24, schrieb Maarten Brock: > > Hi Philipp, > > > > I like that idea. But I also started to move the linker to version 5 and > > this is not done yet. It also has introduced a bug as can be seen in the > > bugtracker. I think this needs some more work before the release is made. > > > > Maarten > > What's the current situation with the linker? It takes a lot of time which I can't find enough of. > Are there any other issues (other than too many open bugs and the items > on http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sdcc/wiki/SDCC%203.1.0%20Release) > that need to be resolved before a release? > > Philipp I'm currently trying to fix the pointer comparison bugs on mcs51 and ds390. Maarten |