From: Ben S. <pow...@16...> - 2014-06-10 09:13:58
|
Hello, As a new developer, I have questions for the regresstion tests on the snapshot page. 1. Does a green star mean success, and a red one mean failure? 2. As the same reversion (rev9031), why earlier tests succeeded, but later tests failed? This seems happen only on Windows 32 / 64. 3. For the same reversion on Windows, does one time success mean it is OK, and other failures can be omitted? 4. Was the Raspbian platform no longer supported? I find that it stoped on September, 2013. 5. Is the NetBSD on sparc64 supported any longer? I see SDCC always fails on it. 6. Where can I see the result for OpenBSD? Since Philipp mentioned issues on it. Is it a official supported platform? 7. Are there any plan for MacOS X 10.6 - 10.9? I am working on 10.9 currently, and SDCC is fine on it. Ben |
From: Philipp K. K. <pk...@sp...> - 2014-06-10 09:38:30
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10.06.2014 11:13, Ben Shi wrote: > Hello, > > As a new developer, I have questions for the regresstion tests on > the snapshot page. > > 1. Does a green star mean success, and a red one mean failure? Yes. When yu click on the star you can see the detailed results. There are currently some problems, see below: > 2. As the same reversion (rev9031), why earlier tests succeeded, > but later tests failed? This seems happen only on Windows 32 / 64. > 3. For the same reversion on Windows, does one time success mean it > is OK, and other failures can be omitted? There are spordic failures on the Widows systems that obody seems to really know about the reason. It seems that this is not an sdcc bug though, as the failures seem to happen in random places. > 4. Was the Raspbian platform no longer supported? I find that it > stoped on September, 2013. I don't know. Maybe whoever maintained that machine took it down? > 5. Is the NetBSD on sparc64 supported any longer? I see SDCC > always fails on it. It is supported. But the build machine is so slow, that it never manages to execute all regression tests in time, so it essentially fails due to running out of time (this issue has come up before, and was then solved by no longer running all tests every day; instead we now alterate between two sets of tests; but more tests were added over time, and now the NetBSD machine is too slow again). > 6. Where can I see the result for OpenBSD? Since Philipp mentioned > issues on it. Is it a official supported platform? We currently do not have an OpenBSD machine in the build farm. I just installed OpenBSD on an old notebook (for other reasons), and once I had an OpenBSD machine, I also used i to try to build sdcc there and run the regression tests. > 7. Are there any plan for MacOS X 10.6 - 10.9? I am working on > 10.9 currently, and SDCC is fine on it. I don't know. Philipp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOW0gAACgkQbtUV+xsoLpoYIQCfWWdyLoxJFqJyHUa75IgZ4o9g uRAAn2UapsIAIB6ezzg6/ay0/UiTfF2W =k7v0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: <wi...@ec...> - 2014-06-10 14:41:09
|
On Tue, June 10, 2014 2:13 am, Ben Shi wrote: > Hello, > > > As a new developer, I have questions for the regresstion tests on the > snapshot page. > > [...] > 7. Are there any plans for MacOS X 10.6 - 10.9? I am working on 10.9 > currently, and SDCC is fine on it. > Hi, I'm the Intel Mac 10.4.11 owner ( and I am typing on it now ). I have Snow Leopard aka 10.6 on my desk. When work lets up and I can arrange for another Mac to hold my files during OS re-install and HD upgrade ( to SSD -- yum ), yes, then we'll have Mac 10.6 . This will also bring in a more recent XCode. :) I'm glad to hear my old XCode makes good binaries for your modern Mac. The nightly compile and regression seems to take just almost 4 hours on my 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 giggle byes of DDR2. Right now I'm looking at August for the upgrade. MacOS support for my little Mac Book only goes up to 10.6 , not enough memory and old graphics chip for the really modern OS's. > > Ben > All the best, *brianW |