Re: [Schematics-development] srfi licensing

[Michael S. <sp...@in...>]

>>>>> "MJ" =3D=3D MJ Ray <mj...@ds...> writes:

MJ> What was the intention? If it was to prevent SRFI-unrelated
MJ> incompatible derived works of the reference implementations, then tha=
t
MJ> is surely not free software=20

No, it doesn't.  The FAQ spells this out, if anyone considers it
necessary.

MJ> The current licence does not seem the best way to preserve the
MJ> integrity of the standards documents.=20

Well, I'm sure the license has its faults.  On the other hand, it's
there now, it's attached to 50+ SRFIs, and we know what it means.

--=20
Cheers =3D8-} Mike
Friede, V=F6lkerverst=E4ndigung und =FCberhaupt blabla