From: Peter K. <ps...@cs...> - 2002-12-12 23:18:17
|
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:05:59PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Sorry for being unclear. I was meaning that you would need one of the > exception-capable SRFIs to be supported by the implementation. I think > SRFI-34 might be useful to you? Well, I just looked at the list of scheme implementations supporting SRFIs and 34 isn't in any of them. When it gets more adopted, I can add it. -pete |