Re: [Sbcl-devel] some PCL defects (again part I)

[William H. N. <wil...@ai...>]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:26:33AM +0400, Alexey Dejneka wrote:
> * (defgeneric foo (x &aux))
> #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION FOO (0)>
> * (defgeneric bar (x &aux y))
> debugger invoked on condition of type SIMPLE-ERROR:
>   &AUX is not allowed in a generic function lambda list: (X &AUX Y)
> 
> restarts:
>   0: [ABORT   ] Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger, returning to toplevel).
>   1: [TOPLEVEL] Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.
> (SB-PCL::CHECK-GF-LAMBDA-LIST (X &AUX Y))
> 0] 
> * (lisp-implementation-version)
> "0.7.7.10"
> 
> I think the first form should signal an error too.

Yes, I agree. If I don't think of a cleverer way to deal with the
problem, today or tomorrow I may add an AUXP return value to the
existing swarm of PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST return values so that the gf ll
checking logic can test it.

-- 
William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...>
Twelve return values should be enough for anyone.
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C  B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C