From: Christophe R. <cr...@us...> - 2002-09-19 17:19:18
|
Update of /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv14113 Modified Files: BUGS package-data-list.lisp-expr version.lisp-expr Log Message: 0.7.7.31: Fix BUG 51b (as per CSR sbcl-devel 2002-09-19) ... but with s/READER-INTERNAL-ERROR/READER-IMPOSSIBLE-NUMBER-ERROR ... and a couple more tests. Delete stale BUGS 131 and 168 Index: BUGS =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/BUGS,v retrieving revision 1.190 retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -d -r1.190 -r1.191 --- BUGS 17 Sep 2002 19:52:29 -0000 1.190 +++ BUGS 19 Sep 2002 17:19:13 -0000 1.191 @@ -297,9 +297,6 @@ (DEFGENERIC FOO03 (X)) (ADD-METHOD (FUNCTION FOO03) M))) should give an error, but SBCL allows it. - b: READ should probably return READER-ERROR, not the bare - arithmetic error, when input a la "1/0" or "1e1000" causes - an arithmetic error. 52: It has been reported (e.g. by Peter Van Eynde) that there are @@ -733,65 +730,6 @@ (bar x))) shouldn't compile without error (because of the extra DEFMACRO symbol). -131: - As of sbcl-0.pre7.86.flaky7.3, the cross-compiler, and probably - the CL:COMPILE function (which is based on the same %COMPILE - mechanism) get confused by -(defun sxhash (x) - (labels ((sxhash-number (x) - (etypecase x - (fixnum (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (integer (sb!bignum:sxhash-bignum x)) - (single-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (double-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - #!+long-float (long-float (error "stub: no LONG-FLOAT")) - (ratio (let ((result 127810327)) - (declare (type fixnum result)) - (mixf result (sxhash-number (numerator x))) - (mixf result (sxhash-number (denominator x))) - result)) - (complex (let ((result 535698211)) - (declare (type fixnum result)) - (mixf result (sxhash-number (realpart x))) - (mixf result (sxhash-number (imagpart x))) - result)))) - (sxhash-recurse (x &optional (depthoid +max-hash-depthoid+)) - (declare (type index depthoid)) - (typecase x - (list - (if (plusp depthoid) - (mix (sxhash-recurse (car x) (1- depthoid)) - (sxhash-recurse (cdr x) (1- depthoid))) - 261835505)) - (instance - (if (typep x 'structure-object) - (logxor 422371266 - (sxhash ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (class-name (layout-class (%instance-layout x))))) - 309518995)) - (symbol (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (number (sxhash-number x)) - (array - (typecase x - (simple-string (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (string (%sxhash-substring x)) - (bit-vector (let ((result 410823708)) - (declare (type fixnum result)) - (dotimes (i (min depthoid (length x))) - (mixf result (aref x i))) - result)) - (t (logxor 191020317 (sxhash (array-rank x)))))) - (character - (logxor 72185131 - (sxhash (char-code x)))) ; through DEFTRANSFORM - (t 42)))) - (sxhash-recurse x))) - complaining "function called with two arguments, but wants exactly - one" about SXHASH-RECURSE. (This might not be strictly a new bug, - since IIRC post-fork CMU CL has also had problems with &OPTIONAL - arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is - only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.) - 135: Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However, @@ -1022,18 +960,6 @@ macro is unhappy with the illegal syntax in the method body, and is giving an unclear error message. -168: - (reported by Dan Barlow on sbcl-devel 2002-05-10) - In sbcl-0.7.3.12, doing - (defstruct foo bar baz) - (compile nil (lambda (x) (or x (foo-baz x)))) - gives an error - debugger invoked on condition of type SB-INT:BUG: - full call to SB-KERNEL:%INSTANCE-REF - This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. [...] - Since this is a reasonable user error, it shouldn't be reported as - an SBCL bug. - 172: sbcl's treatment of at least macro lambda lists is too permissive; e.g., in sbcl-0.7.3.7: @@ -1356,13 +1282,19 @@ APD further reports that this bug is not present in CMUCL. -200: "TRANSLATE-LOGICAL-PATHNAME fails on physical pathname namestrings" - Reported by Kevin Rosenburg on #lisp IRC 2002-09-16 - (TRANSLATE-LOGICAL-PATHNAME "/") - should simply return #P"/", but signals an error in sbcl-0.7.7.28 +201: "Incautious type inference from compound CONS types" + (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-09-17) + (DEFUN FOO (X) + (LET ((Y (CAR (THE (CONS INTEGER *) X)))) + (SETF (CAR X) NIL) + (FORMAT NIL "~S IS ~S, Y = ~S" + (CAR X) + (TYPECASE (CAR X) + (INTEGER 'INTEGER) + (T '(NOT INTEGER))) + Y))) - Fixed in sbcl-0.7.7.29: bug temporarily left here in BUGS to avoid - its number being accidentally reallocated + (FOO ' (1 . 2)) => "NIL IS INTEGER, Y = 1" DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS IR1-#: Index: package-data-list.lisp-expr =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/package-data-list.lisp-expr,v retrieving revision 1.174 retrieving revision 1.175 diff -u -d -r1.174 -r1.175 --- package-data-list.lisp-expr 12 Sep 2002 14:10:01 -0000 1.174 +++ package-data-list.lisp-expr 19 Sep 2002 17:19:13 -0000 1.175 @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ #+x86 "*PSEUDO-ATOMIC-ATOMIC*" #+x86 "*PSEUDO-ATOMIC-INTERRUPTED*" "PUNT-PRINT-IF-TOO-LONG" - "READER-PACKAGE-ERROR" + "READER-IMPOSSIBLE-NUMBER-ERROR" "READER-PACKAGE-ERROR" "SCALE-DOUBLE-FLOAT" "SCALE-LONG-FLOAT" "SCALE-SINGLE-FLOAT" "SEQUENCE-END" "SEQUENCE-OF-CHECKED-LENGTH-GIVEN-TYPE" Index: version.lisp-expr =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/version.lisp-expr,v retrieving revision 1.541 retrieving revision 1.542 diff -u -d -r1.541 -r1.542 --- version.lisp-expr 18 Sep 2002 12:14:20 -0000 1.541 +++ version.lisp-expr 19 Sep 2002 17:19:13 -0000 1.542 @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ ;;; internal versions off the main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. ;;; "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".) -"0.7.7.30" +"0.7.7.31" |