From: William H. N. <wn...@us...> - 2002-09-12 14:10:07
|
Update of /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/code In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv12048/src/code Modified Files: debug.lisp Log Message: 0.7.7.22: added BACKTRACE-AS-LIST Index: debug.lisp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/src/code/debug.lisp,v retrieving revision 1.50 retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -d -r1.50 -r1.51 --- debug.lisp 27 Aug 2002 13:04:52 -0000 1.50 +++ debug.lisp 12 Sep 2002 14:10:01 -0000 1.51 @@ -464,6 +464,20 @@ (print-frame-call frame :number t)) (fresh-line *standard-output*) (values)) + +(defun backtrace-as-list (&optional (count most-positive-fixnum)) + #!+sb-doc "Return a list representing the current BACKTRACE." + (do ((reversed-result nil) + (frame (if *in-the-debugger* *current-frame* (sb!di:top-frame)) + (sb!di:frame-down frame)) + (count count (1- count))) + ((or (null frame) (zerop count)) + (nreverse reversed-result)) + (push (frame-call-as-list frame) reversed-result))) + +(defun frame-call-as-list (frame) + (cons (sb!di:debug-fun-name (sb!di:frame-debug-fun frame)) + (frame-args-as-list frame))) ;;;; frame printing @@ -511,44 +525,51 @@ (:copier nil)) string) -;;; Print FRAME with verbosity level 1. If we hit a &REST arg, then -;;; print as many of the values as possible, punting the loop over -;;; lambda-list variables since any other arguments will be in the -;;; &REST arg's list of values. -(defun print-frame-call-1 (frame) +;;; Extract the function argument values for a debug frame. +(defun frame-args-as-list (frame) (let ((debug-fun (sb!di:frame-debug-fun frame)) (loc (sb!di:frame-code-location frame)) - (reversed-args nil)) - - ;; Construct function arguments in REVERSED-ARGS. + (reversed-result nil)) (handler-case - (dolist (ele (sb!di:debug-fun-lambda-list debug-fun)) - (lambda-list-element-dispatch ele - :required ((push (frame-call-arg ele loc frame) reversed-args)) - :optional ((push (frame-call-arg (second ele) loc frame) - reversed-args)) - :keyword ((push (second ele) reversed-args) - (push (frame-call-arg (third ele) loc frame) - reversed-args)) - :deleted ((push (frame-call-arg ele loc frame) reversed-args)) - :rest ((lambda-var-dispatch (second ele) loc + (progn + (dolist (ele (sb!di:debug-fun-lambda-list debug-fun)) + (lambda-list-element-dispatch ele + :required ((push (frame-call-arg ele loc frame) reversed-result)) + :optional ((push (frame-call-arg (second ele) loc frame) + reversed-result)) + :keyword ((push (second ele) reversed-result) + (push (frame-call-arg (third ele) loc frame) + reversed-result)) + :deleted ((push (frame-call-arg ele loc frame) reversed-result)) + :rest ((lambda-var-dispatch (second ele) loc nil (progn - (setf reversed-args + (setf reversed-result (append (reverse (sb!di:debug-var-value (second ele) frame)) - reversed-args)) + reversed-result)) (return)) (push (make-unprintable-object "unavailable &REST argument") - reversed-args))))) + reversed-result))))) + ;; As long as we do an ordinary return (as opposed to SIGNALing + ;; a CONDITION) from the DOLIST above: + (nreverse reversed-result)) (sb!di:lambda-list-unavailable () - (push (make-unprintable-object "lambda list unavailable") - reversed-args))) + :lambda-list-unavailable)))) + +;;; Print FRAME with verbosity level 1. If we hit a &REST arg, then +;;; print as many of the values as possible, punting the loop over +;;; lambda-list variables since any other arguments will be in the +;;; &REST arg's list of values. +(defun print-frame-call-1 (frame) + (let ((debug-fun (sb!di:frame-debug-fun frame)) + (loc (sb!di:frame-code-location frame))) (pprint-logical-block (*standard-output* nil :prefix "(" :suffix ")") - (let ((args (nreverse (mapcar #'ensure-printable-object reversed-args)))) + (let ((args (mapcar #'ensure-printable-object + (frame-args-as-list frame)))) ;; Since we go to some trouble to make nice informative function ;; names like (PRINT-OBJECT :AROUND (CLOWN T)), let's make sure ;; that they aren't truncated by *PRINT-LENGTH* and *PRINT-LEVEL*. @@ -992,6 +1013,10 @@ ;;; potential DEBUG-VAR from the lambda-list, then the second value is ;;; T. If this returns a keyword symbol or a value from a rest arg, ;;; then the second value is NIL. +;;; +;;; FIXME: There's probably some way to merge the code here with +;;; FRAME-ARGS-AS-LIST. (A fair amount of logic is already shared +;;; through LAMBDA-LIST-ELEMENT-DISPATCH, but I suspect more could be.) (declaim (ftype (function (index list)) nth-arg)) (defun nth-arg (count args) (let ((n count)) @@ -1008,8 +1033,7 @@ :rest ((let ((var (second ele))) (lambda-var-dispatch var (sb!di:frame-code-location *current-frame*) - (error "unused &REST argument before n'th -argument") + (error "unused &REST argument before n'th argument") (dolist (value (sb!di:debug-var-value var *current-frame*) (error |