Re: [Sbcl-help] 0.8.7 doesn't build on SuSE 9.0

[Edi W. <ed...@ag...>]

On 05 Jan 2004 22:06:54 +0100, Wolfgang Jenkner <wje...@in...> wrote:

> Possibly not related, but some time ago I had a problem with
> building a threaded SBCL which manifested itself in SBCL giving a
> 'bad signal number -1' message at warm init and then exiting (so it
> didn't hang).  It was easy to track this down to a bug in (my build
> of) glibc-2.3.1.  A test is to run
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> main ()
> {
>   printf("%d\n",SIGRTMIN);
> }

I get 35 here. Is that good or bad?

> Upgrading to glibc-2.3.2 eliminated the bug.

SuSE 9.0 has glibc 2.3.2. Don't know if that's the original one or if
they've patched it, though.

Edi.