From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2014-05-12 07:18:52
|
Krzysztof Drewniak <krz...@gm...> writes: > I'll probably end up keeping the database and other low-level stuff in > SB-IMPL, and have SB-UNICODE export nice wrapper functions around the DB > (say SB-UNICODE:GENERAL-CATEGORY and things like that). > > Also, if I need more Unicode properties, like the full case mappings or > the Quick_Check properties, should I try to modify the existing database > or add another one? I would suggest that one useful thing to do with the next week of your time is to understand and maybe make robust the existing database: ideally so that an update to the latest Unicode data files doesn't break the build. This is a big ask, but it'll almost certainly be helpful to you later. There are a number of spare bits in the current implementation of the Unicode database; you probably won't be able to get all of what you need in there, but I think it'd be worth a try. Best, Christophe |