[Sbcl-devel] Bug in CLHS regarding multiple-value-call?

[Douglas K. <do...@go...>]

The as-always-non-authoritative CLHS says that the function-form to
M-V-CALL is a "function designator", not an "extended function designator".
So given this:

* (defun (setf foo) (a b c) (format t "Hi ~S ~S ~S~%" a b c) a)
* (defun bar () (multiple-value-call '(setf foo) (values 1 2) 3))

on the 3 implementations I tried, CCL rejects that and CLISP and SBCL
accept.
Would anyone care to opine whether that is a CCL bug, a non-CCL bug, an
oversight in CLHS...?