From: Martin C. <cra...@co...> - 2011-05-12 13:10:08
|
Nikodemus Siivola wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:30:53PM +0300: > On 11 May 2011 20:41, Martin Cracauer <cra...@co...> wrote: > > Nikodemus Siivola wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:49:53PM +0300: > >> I just committed deadlock detection code for spinlocks and mutexes into CVS. > >> > >> Please let me know if you see slowdowns in applications due to this: > >> currently deadlocks are checked always on contested locks, but I can > >> make it optional if there are performance issues. > > > > The asdf changes broke my toy's build so I can't tell :-) > > Do you have any details? Just some build system irregularities, Fare fixed them here. I'm afraid my toy gets more than a percent slowdown from the deadlock detection, in fact 1.1%, aka My Life Is *Uttery* Ruined(tm) class. Seriously, I'll dig some more. We might be willing to pay that much for the debugability. But I'm out of office today. Also, nice signature you got there: [...] > Cheers, > > -- Nikodemus > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability > What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Hehe :-) > Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools > to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > Sbc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cra...@co...> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ |