Re: [Sbcl-devel] [PATCH] Revamp function documentation

[Leslie P. P. <sk...@vi...>]

> OK, I don't see how this is, and I don't see a test case for it,
> either.  As far as I can tell, this needs more work.
>
> Here are some examples of test cases that probe a little bit more
> deeply:

Thanks. As Nikodemus suspected I misunderstood the question
(or rather did not take its full implications into account).

This would have to be addressed eventually, but considering
that the current code does not account for it either I'd
rather leave it for later as an additional feature to be
implemented.

As for the core size, I'm not sure whether the numbers are
a problem. Since you asked the question I guess you can
judge this better than me.

  Leslie

-- 
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer
Xing Profile: https://www.xing.com/profile/LeslieP_Polzer
Blog: http://blog.viridian-project.de/