Re: [Sbcl-devel] [PATCH] WHO-SPECIALIZES

[Gary K. <gw...@me...>]

I'd suggest who-specializes-directly and who-specializes. (FWIW,  
moptilities has direct-specializers-of and all-specializers-of).




On Oct 4, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:

> Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes:
>
>> [ My guess is that I would want to use WHO-SPECIALIZES on a class  
>> when
>>  changing that class.  In those circumstances, I'm not sure why I
>>  would want to see methods specializing on subclasses.  Judging from
>>  the methods in slime's various backends, I don't see any kind of
>>  consensus: openmcl maps over subclasses but lispworks doesn't. ]
>
> Subclasses could be affected by such a change, too. I think both
> behaviours are potentially useful.
>
> I'll add a new xref function called WHO-SPECIALIZES-ALL (name
> suggestions welcomed) which behaves recursively.
>
> WHO-SPECIALIZES will only list directly specializing methods.
>
> D'accord?
>
>  -T.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> Sbc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel

--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM