From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2008-08-31 19:00:16
|
Gerard Robin <g.r...@fr...> writes: > (I think to the remark of Christophe saying that cl-port is irrelevant > with sbcl: > cl-port is irrelevant with sbcl I didn't say it was irrelevant. I said that I advised against using it, because it is buggy, poorly documented, badly motivated and unsupported; nevertheless, if you do want to use it, be prepared to report or fix bugs in it, and to send those reports or bug fixes to the maintainers of cl-port, rather than to sbcl-help. Best, Christophe |