From: Elliott S. <ell...@gm...> - 2008-08-30 03:34:33
|
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Matthew D. Swank <ako...@gm...> wrote: > > Elliott Slaughter <elliottslaughter <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > > <nikodemus <at> random-state.net> wrote: > > > Can you post the current EBX patch in its entirety for review, without > > > other changes? (No rush, but rather something to do when you need a > > > break from debugging EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION...) > > > > Sure. The patch applies to 1.0.18, and ought to compile fine on win32 > > and linux. I also trivially forwarded ported the patch to 1.0.19.29. > > Only the former is attached to this email due to message size > > restrictions, but both have been uploaded to the following urls. > > > > http://blackthorncentral.net/files/1.0.18-x86-ebx-threads-combined.patch > > http://blackthorncentral.net/files/1.0.19.29-x86-ebx-threads- > combined.patch > > > > I applied the second patch to the current cvs and tried to compile on win32 > using cygwin. Is there another directory I need to include to get the headers > right? What target features did you build with? This is only a patch for reserving the EBX register (and using EBX threads on linux), it does not contain the changes necessary to compile with sb-thread on win32. -- Elliott Slaughter "Any road followed precisely to its end leads precisely nowhere." - Frank Herbert |