From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2008-07-17 09:51:33
|
For the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matt Kaufmann <kau...@cs...> Date: Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:45 PM Subject: [sbc...@li...: SBCL 1.0.18 installation failure] To: nik...@ra..., js...@ik... Hi -- According to http://www.sbcl.org/: Reporting a bug in SBCL should be done by sending e-mail to the sbcl-devel mailing list. The master record of known bugs is in the BUGS file, which is distributed with SBCL. But my email to sbcl-devel was rejected (and I don't think it makes sense for me to join; I'm not an SBCL developer). Please feel free to forward my email, below, to sbcl-devel if you like. Regards, Matt ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Subject: SBCL 1.0.18 installation failure From: sbc...@li... To: kau...@cs... Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:41:34 -0700 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: sbc...@li... X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-132 required=165 - --===============0010735244== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Non-subscribers are not permitted to post to the sbcl-devel mailing list. Please subscribe yourself to the list, and resend this message. Sincerely, The keepers of the sbcl-devel mailing list - --===============0010735244== Content-Type: message/rfc822 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KJDob-0004so-PB for sbc...@li...; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:41:33 -0700 Received: from joejob.cs.utexas.edu ([128.83.120.81] ident=root) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1KJDoa-0002S0-EP for sbc...@li...; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:41:33 -0700 Received: from lhug-13.cs.utexas.edu (kau...@lh... [128.83.130.167]) by joejob.cs.utexas.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6GKfS1x019670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <sbc...@li...>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:41:28 -0500 Received: (from kaufmann@localhost) by lhug-13.cs.utexas.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6GKfSI6024622; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:41:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:41:28 -0500 Message-Id: <200...@lh...> From: Matt Kaufmann <kau...@cs...> To: sbc...@li... Subject: SBCL 1.0.18 installation failure X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 Hi -- Just FYI -- feel free to ignore this if it's not of interest. I just installed SBCL 1.0.18 on a linux (ubuntu) machine, but obtained "test failed", as follows. It seems to work fine for my own purposes, but I thought you might want to know about the failure. ============================================================ lhug-13:/projects/acl2/lisps/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.18> sh make.sh //starting build: Wed Jul 16 14:14:41 CDT 2008 //SBCL_XC_HOST="sbcl --disable-debugger --userinit /dev/null --sysinit /dev/null" .... lots of output .... The build seems to have finished successfully, including 15 (out of 15) contributed modules. If you would like to run more extensive tests on .... a little more output .... lhug-13:/projects/acl2/lisps/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.18> cd tests && sh run-tests.sh /running tests on '/projects/acl2/lisps/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.18/tests/../src/runtime/sbcl --core /projects/acl2/lisps/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.18/tests/../output/sbcl.core --noinform --no-sysinit --no-userinit --noprint --disable-debugger' .... lots of output .... Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353) Expected failure: external-format.impure.lisp / (CHARACTER-DECODE-LARGE FORCE-END-OF-FILE) Failure: step.impure.lisp / STEP-BACKTRACE test failed, expected 104 return code, got 1 ============================================================ Actually, for my own application I do have one issue -- suggestions are welcome, but this is minor for me (one test out of thousands). ........... Error: Heap exhausted (no more space for allocation). There are still 4616192 bytes available; the request was for 12000016 bytes. ........... Regards, Matt Kaufmann - --===============0010735244==-- ------- End of forwarded message ------- |