From: Tobias C. R. <tc...@fr...> - 2008-01-19 12:08:57
|
"Nathan Froyd" <fr...@gm...> writes: > On Jan 18, 2008 7:50 PM, Daniel Herring <dhe...@te...> wrote: > > - a "tailcall" special function or a more general > > (stack-smash-call new-function &rest args) > > You do realize that SBCL already supports this under the right > optimization settings...? The advantage of an explicit TAILCALL macro (or special form) is that it should signal a warning if the compiler could in fact /not/ eliminate that tail call. -T. |