From: Brian M. <br...@ma...> - 2007-12-05 02:32:50
|
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:21:21PM -0800, Cyrus Harmon wrote: > yay apple. Well, we know that 10.4-built SBCL binaries work on 10.5. > I'm guessing the converse isn't true :( The easy test is a simple C > program that calls, say, kill, built on 10.5 and run on 10.4. If that > doesn't work, then my suspicion is probably correct. The fix would be > to figure out how to make the simple test program work. Of course I > could be wrong about all of this and, fortunately, I don't have access > to a 10.4 box to test this. > > In the meantime, grab an older build and rebuild from source if you > want the latest and greatest. This is due to Apple's changes for UNIX'03 compliance: http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-dev/2007/Nov/msg00108.html We should probably set the minimum version to 10.3 on PPC and 10.4 on x86. -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@ma... http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ |