From: Cyrus H. <ch...@bo...> - 2007-06-02 05:43:54
|
My mistake. I guess I'm in the minority that doesn't use asdf-install and I forgot that we maintain our own copy. Cyrus On Jun 1, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Juho Snellman wrote: > Cyrus Harmon <ch...@bo...> writes: >> I don't think sbcl-devel is the appropriate place for whining about >> asdf-install patches being accepted or not. I'm not sure where, if >> anywhere, you're message would be appropriate, but I'm pretty sure >> sbcl-devel isn't one of those places. > > sbcl-devel is the right place for patches to the asdf-install that's > included with SBCL, since it's basically a separate entity from the > portable asdf-install. (This is different for asdf, where the policy > is for sbcl to use a verbatim copy of the upstream version). > >> On Jun 1, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Scott L. Burson wrote: >> >>> So, is anyone even going to reply to my message? I went to the >>> trouble of fixing the bugs, testing the fixes, and sending you a >>> patch. It would be nice to get some kind of response. > > Thank you very much for your work. Unfortunately most sbcl committers > are very busy people, so it might not be reasonable to expect a > substantial reply within four days. At least I haven't had very much > time to review sbcl patches lately, and when I have the time, there > are a bunch of earlier ones to deal with before I get to yours. But > don't worry, I'm sure we'll get around to it. > > Just as a note, a unified diff would be preferrable over a context > diff, since the former is much easier to read. > > -- > Juho Snellman > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > Sbc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel |