From: <wil...@ai...> - 2007-04-19 20:17:50
|
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:29:25AM +0300, Nikodemus Siivola wrote: > James Y Knight wrote: > > > Hi, I set up a buildbot, an automated build tool, for SBCL at http:// > > sbcl.static.net/. It is setup to build, run tests (and report the > > outcome), and then build a binary and put it online after each > > commit. It will do this for every architecture with an online > > buildslave. I consider the auto-testing the main point of this, and > > the autobuilding of binary tarballs for every architecture a nice > > side-benefit. > > This is very cool. > > > It doesn't currently send out emails, but (unless there's > > objections), I'd like to set it up to send an email whenever someone > > breaks a build. Do people read the use...@us... > > email addrs that the commit messages are from? > > Like Juho said, I believe these are forwarded to sensible addresses, > and I at least would not mind emails. I wouldn't mind emails either, but why not have the build tool just send the brokenness notification to sbcl-devel, the way humans do when they notice something is broken? It shouldn't happen often enough to be an annoying source of noise, and sometimes some random reader of sbcl-devel might want to know that version x.y.z is not a good choice to check out and build, or might even have a patch. -- William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...> PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C Ubi saeva indignatio ulterius cor lacerare nequit. -- Jonathan Swift's epitaph |