Re: [Sbcl-devel] Solaris 10 (x86) builds of SBCL

[Juho S. <js...@ik...>]

"Joubert Nel" <jou...@gm...> writes:
> I first tried building version 1.0.2 but it failed miserably. Then decided
> to use 0.9.14 to build successively newer versions and have built all the
> way up to 0.9.17 (but the test suite doesn't pass and so was hoping to first
> get a feel for whether anybody else is using SBCL on Solaris).

Telling how the build is failing might get you more useful answers :-)
It's possible be that the current CVS version will work, if the
problem is the same one that Thomas Burdick reported.
   
> > Before I do, there are a few things I'm wondering about:
> > > 1) Who is responsible for Solaris binaries?
> >
> > Technically nobody is responsible for anything :-) I did make the
> > previous Solaris/x86 binary, but am unlikely to make any newer ones.
> 
> OK - I thought since there was a previous binary the source for later
> versions might also be getting built for Solaris.
>
> Are you running SBCL on Solaris? Which version of SBCL?

No. I have a Solaris/x86 box for SBCL porting and testing, but I don't
boot it up very often.

-- 
Juho Snellman