[Sbcl-devel] Re: Troubles building sbcl 0.9.5/0.9.6 on x86_64

[Vadim V. Z. <vv...@ne...>]

Juho Snellman writes:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:45:48PM +0300, Vadim V. Zhytnikov wrote:
> 
>>*CREATE-CLASSES-FROM-INTERNAL-STRUCTURE-DEFINITIONS-P* ...)
>>; compiling (DEFUN FIND-CLASS-FROM-CELL ...)fatal error encountered in
>>SBCL pid 7579:
>>no pointer at 0 in hash table
>>The system is too badly corrupted or confused to continue at the Lisp
>>level. If the system had been compiled with the SB-LDB feature, we'd
>>drop into the LDB low-level debugger now. But there's no LDB in this
>>build, so we can't really do anything but just exit, sorry.
>>================================================
>>
>>?ardware: Athlon 64 3200+ on ASUS A8V Deluxe with 1Gb RAM.
>>Software: ALT Linux with heavily patched 2.6.12 x86_64
>>kernel.
> 
> 
> My first guess would be that this is gcc-related. Which gcc version
> are you using? Does an official SBCL x86-64 binary from sourceforge
> work reliably on the same machine?
> 

Oops!  I overlooked official x86-64 build on sf.net (it is 0.9.4,
but I tried to find 0.9.5 x86-64 buil).  With 0.9.4 as build host
result is precisely the same as with clisp.  It builds 0.9.6
but this fresh sbcl 0.9.6 crashes right after first start.
And error is exacly the same
...
; compiling (DEFUN FIND-CLASS-FROM-CELL ...)fatal error encountered in
SBCL pid 8809:
no pointer at 0 in hash table

 > gcc --version
x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20050721 (ALT Linux, build 3.4.4-alt3)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.



-- 
      Vadim V. Zhytnikov

       <vv...@ma...>
      <vv...@ne...>