Re: [Sbcl-devel] [PATCH] Mips branch delay slot audit

[Thiemo S. <th...@ne...>]

Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'm pretty sure this extra nop, and similar ones you've added in
> > type-vops.lisp, aren't in fact necessary.  The first instruction of a
> > %TEST-FOO sequence involves moving something into the temporary
> > register, which is harmless.
> 
> Updated accordingly.

Ping?


Thiemo