Re: [Sbcl-devel] Re: Patch to add socket-error-socket slot to socket-error

[Antonio M. <ant...@gm...>]

> This looks reasonable to me, but it could do with two changes, I
> think: firstly, why should SOCKET-ERROR take an &OPTIONAL socket
> argument?  Surely it should be mandatory.  Secondly, this should
> probably be documented in sb-bsd-sockets.texinfo.

With the alluring carrot of a merged socket patch dangling before my
eyes, how could I possibly resist?  Even <shudder> the documentation
bit!  I'll prepare a new diff and send it along as soon as I get a
free moment on my home machine.

Thanks,

--Tony