From: Rudi S. <ru...@co...> - 2005-02-17 19:18:57
|
On 17. Feb 2005, at 17:38, Raymond Wiker wrote: > Raymond Wiker writes: >> >> Is there some way of avoiding the defpackage for #:XML (in the >> defsystem form, preferably)? [snip] > (defpackage #:XML > (:use #:common-lisp #+sbcl #:sb-mop)) > > (defsystem XML > :serial t > :components > ((:file "xml-utilities") [snap] The usual pattern is to have a file "package.lisp" with all defpackage forms as a first component of the system, and have all other files depend on that file. Rudi |