[Sbcl-devel] Re: lazy allocation for sbcl

[Peter V. E. <pva...@de...>]

On 2004-12-08, Peter Van Eynde <pva...@de...> wrote:
> - The cmucl code had problems with system calls, as the lisp thought the

Bummer. The new image cannot recompile itself reliably. The errors seem
related to system calls (files not renamed, files not found etc). So
where does the lisp allocate memory? I'll try to add a 'fill with zero'
there to see if it helps...

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|