From: Fred <fre...@pe...> - 2014-09-02 09:00:56
|
Found in liquidsoap ML archives, post from Radionomy staff: The 140 liquidsoaps are running on a dual-CPU xeon 5500 series (8 physical cores - 16 logical cores HT) with 12 GB RAM. On a single core i7 processors we run 80 liquidsoap instances. On a single core2duo we ran 25 liquidsoap instances Are you planning to run more than this? Fred Le 02/09/2014 05:35, Josh Stirland a écrit : > Hello, > This is because liquidsoap is single-threaded and I'd rather put less > load on 1 cpu and spread it out. Also, running all the streams that I > will be would need more than one. > > On 02/09/2014, Fred <fre...@pe...> wrote: >> Le 01/09/2014 22:02, Josh Stirland a écrit : >>> Hello liquidsoap users, >>> I was just wondering that since liquidsoap is only singal-threaded, if >>> there is an easy way to output a source to another instance that can >>> re-encode it? >>> I'm doing this since I want 1 instance to output at diffrent bitrates, >>> and the second one to manage the music sources. >>> I thought of just using an internal harber server that cant be >>> accessed from outside which is streaming at high quality, but I'm >>> wondering if there is a more efficient way of doing this. >>> Thanks. >>> >> Hi, >> >> Why not doing this inside a single script? >> You can manage a lot of independant sources at the same time and mix >> them as needed using one script. >> Outputs with different bitrates can be managed inside this script too. >> >> Fred >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Slashdot TV. >> Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. >> http://tv.slashdot.org/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Savonet-users mailing list >> Sav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users >> > |