From: David B. <dav...@gm...> - 2012-03-31 16:31:03
|
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:51 PM, <liq...@ao...> wrote: > I think your answer to Aleander Dal Farra is probably the root cause (or I > hope so) since his output is very similar to mine. No, I don't think it's related. The balancing of activations has nothing to do with stream formats. > Might be a good suggestion for the FAQ or docs to list the changes needed in > output from ls 0.92 to ls 1.0.0. It has been said clearly in the announce for 1.0, and its release notes (CHANGES) and repeated several times since then. I guess it's missing from FAQ, and adding it wouldn't hurt. Cheers, -- David |