From: Martin K. <mar...@so...> - 2012-02-21 16:19:06
|
Hi Romain, You are right :) It looks like Liquidsoap is using half the memory we thought it was. Thanks for this. Martin 2012/2/15 Romain Beauxis <to...@ra...> > 2012/2/15 Martin Konečný <mar...@so...>: > > Hi David, Romain, > > Hi Martin! > > > I was looking into reducing the Liquidsoap memory footprint and stumbled > > across this: > > http://savonet.sourceforge.net/doc-0.9.1/optimization.html > > > > I don't see this page in the 1.0 final documentation, so I was wondering > if > > this setting is still supported? Trying it out shows no changes in memory > > usage. > > These changes never proved to be any useful so they were dropped some > time later.. > > > Currently our Liquidsoap script takes roughly 180MB so we would like to > try > > reducing the footprint. > > Hmm.. That seems a lot indeed. How many streams are you running to get > this footprint? Also, is that a stable number (do you suspect a memory > leak) ? > > Finally, are you sure that this 180MB represents the amount of memory > actually used by the process? I believe that there is a difference > between the memory space, i.e. memory address pointers that are > accessible by the application and memory actually instantiated. For > instance, on RadioPi, we have: > 279m 58m > Which is 279MB of memory virtual space but 58MB of memory actually > allocated. Since this is for 9 different streams running with the same > script, I wonder about your number above :-) > > Romain > -- Open source radio in the cloud. Get yours now! ---> http://airtime.pro Martin Konecny Software Developer, Sourcefabric mar...@so... 720 Bathurst St. Suite 203 M5S 2R4, Toronto, ON, Canada +1 (416) 892-8420 (Cell) Skype: martin.konecny15 http://www.sourcefabric.org http://www.twitter.com/Sourcefabric |