From: David B. <dav...@en...> - 2009-03-27 19:59:36
|
Romeo wrote: > in my question i mean if i can define a function without it's > implementation, and implement it later in the code No, you cannot do that. One reason is that it would be impossible for us to guess te type of your function and check that you use it correctly. The real reason is that it just doesn't fit well in the functional programming paradigm. And it could hide recursivity -- not necessarily a bad thing, but it's also not necessarily a bad thing to know that all your liquidsoap functions will always terminate. You just have to write things in the right order. Don't hesitate to use %include if that makes for a clearer code, though. Have fun, David |