Re: [RDT-Dev] 0.7.0 release candidate

[David C. <dc...@us...>]

On Tuesday 20 December 2005 06:03 pm, Christopher Williams wrote:
> Thomas,
>    Right now we haven't updated our jruby.jar. 

That's not correct.  We have updated it since JRuby was last released, but I 
did not tag it at the time.  (I thought we had a long way to go, and it 
sounded like a JRuby release was imminent).

>    On one of my 
> development machines I have a version of jruby based on HEAD but with
> the patch you sent to this ML applied. I also had to do a significant
> amount of work to make our code interacting with JRuby work again
> (interfaces for NodeVisitors changed or something).
>
> Personally I'd prefer we use what we have now for 0.7.0 or whatever
> we call it, and our next release we can try and line up JRuby and RDT
> again.
>

Because we cannot identify reliably what version we are using now (my bad), 
I'd favor update to HEAD and tagging appropriately. I'll work on this (if 
agreed to).  Not sure of exactly when, but I'm off for 11 days starting 
Friday.