From: <sj...@sp...> - 2006-04-29 14:06:05
|
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:35:20PM +0900, Masao Mutoh wrote: > Hi Sjoerd, > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:08:41 +0900 > Masao Mutoh <mu...@hi...> wrote: > > > Hi Sjoerd, > > > > Now, I and Kou investigate another serious bug on CVS. > > New signal handler implementation may causes SEGV. > > #It's reported by Joao. > > > > We'll fix it, and try your patch again. > > Finally, kou fixed this problem. > > So, I tried your patch and avtest. > But it's occured segmentation fault yet. > > I tried 2 patterns below: > > 1. Your patch before kou fixed joao problems(0.14.1 base). > -> rbgobj_closure.c.0.14.1+ > > 2. Your patch applied against latest CVS(fixed joao problems). > -> rbgobj_closure.c.1 > > Both of them occurs segmentation fault. > > Could you try them again? > > * Both are not patch but rbgobj_closure.c itself. > Replace them to original rbgobj_closure.c. > * Try latest CVS Ruby/GLib2. Strangely, both fixed the problem for me (with current anon CVS and with the vanilla 0.14.1 release).. Can you send a backtrace the segv you get ? Sjoerd -- The purpose of Physics 7A is to make the engineers realize that they're not perfect, and to make the rest of the people realize that they're not engineers. |