From: Torli B. <rub...@an...> - 2009-02-11 15:16:30
|
Phil Thompson wrote: > I've seen a few patches go in regarding compatibility with 1.9. I've > started a home project using Ruby Gnome 2 and wondered whether I should > try using 1.9 for it. > ... Have you tried Open Komodo (http://www.openkomodo.com/). But be careful there are two products: (1) Komodo EDI, and (2) Komodo Edit. Komodo Edit is free, and it is a very decent editor. As far as Ruby GTK+ is concerned, I believe it is the most promising GUI for Ruby, and hopefully it will become the GUI of choice for most open software enterprises on all platforms. However it is rather immature at the moment. There are many issues with Ruby-GNOME2 and Ruby 1.9. With GNOME2 everybody seems to be stuck with Ruby 1.8 for a while. I am not aware if the latest release of 1.9.1 fixed any of the problems. I hope things will get better in the not so distant future. However there definitely are grey areas particularly related to vector graphic, canvas and even Pango, that need a lot of fixing and even additional development before we will have a true Ruby graphical environment. Nevertheless, I do believe that GTK+ is the right choice when it comes to which GUI to learn for Ruby, mostly because it is the best bet to eventually achieve platform transparency! As far as Ruby 1.8 and 1.9 go, I can testify to the fact that the two incarnations can run absolutely without any problems side by side. Though GNOME2 is designed so it would also compile safely into either environment without obscuring the other, due to its immaturity, I shied away from such a scenario, at least until people here will start posting encouraging comments about the possibility of a successful marriage between 1.9 and GNOME2. Hope this was helpful for now, and warned you about the potential traps you may fall in if you assumed things were in a better shape than they truly are. Good luck, Torli -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |