Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] RVAL2CBOOL vs RTEST

[Guillaume C. <gco...@gm...>]

On 7/13/07, Masao Mutoh <mu...@hi...> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:10:55 +0200
> "Guillaume Cottenceau" <gco...@gm...> wrote:
>
> > I've counted 88 uses of RVAL2CBOOL and 401 uses of RTEST in the code.
> > As RVAL2CBOOL is defined to use RTEST, I think we should should choose
> > either one, and then use only one form. RTEST is more rubyish but
> > RVAL2CBOOL makes sense as long as we also use CBOOL2RVAL.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> RVAL2CBOOL is better.

May I go ahead and substitute all uses of RTEST by uses of RVAL2CBOOL?

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://zarb.org/~gc/