From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2009-10-20 14:18:04
Attachments:
2009-10-20-151544_303x144_scrot.png
|
I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from doing so. |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2009-10-20 17:26:40
|
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from > doing so. Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a very simple patch at <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. The bad news is it's part of a monolithic source package (gnome-python-desktop) so to build your own replacement python-wnck you'll need a shed load of build dependencies. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2009-10-20 17:50:16
|
Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 > Mark Williams<mar...@nt...> wrote: > >> I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from >> doing so. > > Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a > very simple patch at > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and > <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the > bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. > > The bad news is it's part of a monolithic source package > (gnome-python-desktop) so to build your own replacement python-wnck > you'll need a shed load of build dependencies. > What's Debian's is Ubuntu/s. Bugs and all. ;-) |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2009-11-23 19:30:15
Attachments:
01_glib_mkenums.patch
|
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:26:28 +0100 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 > Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > > > I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from > > doing so. > > Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a > very simple patch at > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and > <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the > bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. Ubuntu are aware of it, but according to upstream the bug is in libwnck, not the python bindings. To fix it: apt-get source libwnck cd libwnck-2.28.0 <Drop the attached patch into debian/patches> rm libwnck/wnck-enum-types.* sudo apt-get build-dep libwnck dch -i <This opens the changelog in a text editor. Add some blurb if you like. The important thing is that it gets a newer version number to stop it being replaced by the unfixed official version when you upgrade.> debuild -uc -us cd .. sudo dpkg -i libwnck*.deb -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Abrolag <ab...@us...> - 2009-12-06 22:54:29
|
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:30:01 +0000 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:26:28 +0100 > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 > > Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > > > > > I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from > > > doing so. > > > > Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a > > very simple patch at > > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and > > <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the > > bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. > > Ubuntu are aware of it, but according to upstream the bug is in libwnck, > not the python bindings. > > To fix it: > > apt-get source libwnck > cd libwnck-2.28.0 > <Drop the attached patch into debian/patches> > rm libwnck/wnck-enum-types.* > sudo apt-get build-dep libwnck > dch -i > <This opens the changelog in a text editor. Add some blurb if you like. > The important thing is that it gets a newer version number to stop it > being replaced by the unfixed official version when you upgrade.> > debuild -uc -us > cd .. > sudo dpkg -i libwnck*.deb > Finally had time to try this out. It seems to work fine with tasktray but devtray has a problem. If you double-click on devtray to open a window it is OK, but if you drag it to the icon bar it 'soft' crashes roxfiler - in that you can restart rox and everything then works correctly, including tasktray. Curiously if you have it loaded on the icon bar and do a restart everything works without problems! This is running on debian squeeze -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2009-12-06 23:23:07
|
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:54:16 +0000 Abrolag <ab...@us...> wrote: > Finally had time to try this out. > > It seems to work fine with tasktray but devtray has a problem. > > If you double-click on devtray to open a window it is OK, but if you > drag it to the icon bar it 'soft' crashes roxfiler - in that you can > restart rox and everything then works correctly, including tasktray. > > Curiously if you have it loaded on the icon bar and do a restart > everything works without problems! > > This is running on debian squeeze Yes, that's been happening to me (Debian sid) and Mark Williams (IIRC) (Ubuntu) lately too, it isn't just DevTray. I think there's an obscure bug in recent versions of GTK+. I'll have to see if I can gather enough information by using --sync and *-dbg packages to file a useful bug report. When developing Media I found that I could make the crashes at least much rarer by changing the order in which the hierarchy of the applet's widgets are shown and placed inside each other etc, but I'm not sure I enirely cured it. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2010-06-03 13:01:26
|
What's the Ubuntu version of debian/patches? Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:26:28 +0100 > Tony Houghton<h...@re...> wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 >> Mark Williams<mar...@nt...> wrote: >> >>> I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from >>> doing so. >> >> Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a >> very simple patch at >> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and >> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the >> bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. > > Ubuntu are aware of it, but according to upstream the bug is in libwnck, > not the python bindings. > > To fix it: > > apt-get source libwnck > cd libwnck-2.28.0 > <Drop the attached patch into debian/patches> > rm libwnck/wnck-enum-types.* > sudo apt-get build-dep libwnck > dch -i > <This opens the changelog in a text editor. Add some blurb if you like. > The important thing is that it gets a newer version number to stop it > being replaced by the unfixed official version when you upgrade.> > debuild -uc -us > cd .. > sudo dpkg -i libwnck*.deb > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > > > _______________________________________________ > rox-users mailing list > rox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rox-users |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2010-06-03 13:42:02
|
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:00:51 +0100 Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > What's the Ubuntu version of debian/patches? It should be the same as in debian. Are you still having trouble with a newer version of the package than 2.28.0? I'm using Debian unstable which has 2.30.0. This uses source format 3.0 (quilt) so the procedure for adding a patch is slightly different, but I would have thought the bug is fixed in this version anyway. Does your version include a file debian/source/format containing "3.0 (quilt)"? If so, instead of copying the patch file to debian/patches run these commands: quilt import path_to_patch_file quilt push -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2009-10-20 18:10:13
|
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:46:05 +0100 Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > Tony Houghton wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 > > Mark Williams<mar...@nt...> wrote: > > > >> I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from > >> doing so. > > > > Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a > > very simple patch at > > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and > > <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the > > bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. > > > > The bad news is it's part of a monolithic source package > > (gnome-python-desktop) so to build your own replacement python-wnck > > you'll need a shed load of build dependencies. > > > What's Debian's is Ubuntu/s. Bugs and all. Not really, they have separate bug trackers and some of the packages are very different. In some areas Debian unstable has newer versions than Ubuntu, but Ubuntu is more bleeding edge in some other areas eg moving the default python to newer versions more quickly. I expect they have quite similar python-gnome-desktop packages though. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2009-10-20 19:37:57
|
Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:46:05 +0100 > Mark Williams<mar...@nt...> wrote: > >> Tony Houghton wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100 >>> Mark Williams<mar...@nt...> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from >>>> doing so. >>> >>> Oh no, they've gone and let that bug into Karmic have they? There's a >>> very simple patch at >>> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549271> and >>> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597319>. Please report the >>> bug to Ubuntu too if someone else hasn't already. >>> >>> The bad news is it's part of a monolithic source package >>> (gnome-python-desktop) so to build your own replacement python-wnck >>> you'll need a shed load of build dependencies. >>> >> What's Debian's is Ubuntu/s. Bugs and all. > > Not really, they have separate bug trackers and some of the packages are > very different. In some areas Debian unstable has newer versions than > Ubuntu, but Ubuntu is more bleeding edge in some other areas eg moving > the default python to newer versions more quickly. I expect they have > quite similar python-gnome-desktop packages though. > For some reason I can't save the autogenerated bug report and I really don't know how to summarise the bug in my own words. |
From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2009-11-15 16:05:18
Attachments:
BugReport
|
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:14 +0100, Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > I'd post the bug report except this bleeding pop up window stops me from > doing so. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Update. Finally managed to get a bug report by vigorously clicking the OK button Attached. |
From: Liam P. <lp...@gm...> - 2010-06-03 13:13:16
|
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > What's the Ubuntu version of debian/patches? That's an old thread you're commenting to! I don't know the answer, but I think you might find one on the Ubuntu support list: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions" <ubu...@li...> Or failing that possibly on the (fairly quiet) Ubuntu-Developers list: <ubu...@li...> -- Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven Email: lp...@ci... • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lp...@gm... Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419 AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven MSN: lp...@ho... • ICQ: 73187508 |
From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2010-06-03 13:28:56
|
Liam Proven wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Mark Williams > <mar...@nt...> wrote: >> What's the Ubuntu version of debian/patches? > > That's an old thread you're commenting to! > > I don't know the answer, but I think you might find one on the Ubuntu > support list: > "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions" > <ubu...@li...> > > Or failing that possibly on the (fairly quiet) Ubuntu-Developers list: > <ubu...@li...> > It's okay, I found it. The previous instructions created a source package. I just had to decompress it to find the debian folder. After that everything went pretty well. |