From: Keith R. J. W. <kr...@op...> - 2003-05-28 03:25:07
|
I know someone mentioned this once before but I cannot locate the thread. In any case, what's the deal with the thumbnail generation progress indicator being all wonky? OK let me explain that again: for a given directory of ~50 images (at 800x600 or so), the progress indicator moves maybe 10% of the way. Once *all* the thumbs have been generated, the progress indicator moves the remaining 90%. What, if any, was the solution for this? ROX-Filer 1.3.9 compiled from source also a problem with 1.3.8 -- Keith R. John Warno [k r j w at optonline dot net] "We are anthill men upon an anthill world." -- Ray Bradbury |
From: Alastair P. <ala...@li...> - 2003-05-28 04:23:05
|
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 15:24, Keith R. John Warno wrote: > I know someone mentioned this once before but I cannot locate the > thread. In any case, what's the deal with the thumbnail generation > progress indicator being all wonky? OK let me explain that again: for a > given directory of ~50 images (at 800x600 or so), the progress indicator > moves maybe 10% of the way. Once *all* the thumbs have been generated, > the progress indicator moves the remaining 90%. What, if any, was the > solution for this? > > ROX-Filer 1.3.9 compiled from source > also a problem with 1.3.8 ditto for me... it was fine in 1.3.6/7.. maybe this would be nice to have fixed for 2... -- (o< - A l a s t a i r P o r t e r //\ -- NEW EMAIL -- V_/_ ala...@li... |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2003-06-09 13:10:49
|
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:22:41PM +1200, Alastair Porter wrote: > On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 15:24, Keith R. John Warno wrote: > > I know someone mentioned this once before but I cannot locate the > > thread. In any case, what's the deal with the thumbnail generation > > progress indicator being all wonky? OK let me explain that again: for a > > given directory of ~50 images (at 800x600 or so), the progress indicator > > moves maybe 10% of the way. Once *all* the thumbs have been generated, > > the progress indicator moves the remaining 90%. What, if any, was the > > solution for this? > > > > ROX-Filer 1.3.9 compiled from source > > also a problem with 1.3.8 > ditto for me... it was fine in 1.3.6/7.. > maybe this would be nice to have fixed for 2... I don't think anything changed. It just depends which thumbnails have been cached (obviously, those load faster than new/changed ones). -- Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net ta...@ec... ta...@us... GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |