From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-10-30 08:00:08
|
I grabbed ROX-Session ran it, 0lanuch started up as expected, downloaded the required packages then when it tried to startup it crashed claiming it couldn't find libxml2.so, a quick ldd on the cached version or ROX-Session quickly revealed it was a 32bit binary Is anyone providing AMD64 packages for 0install? If not how do I go about building such packages for use with 0install? -- Lucas Hazel <lu...@di...> Digit Illogic Enterises [http://digitillogic.net/www] [phone: 0401313870] [ABN: 52841332786] AMAC Fast Track Computers Technician 209 Beardy Street, Armidale NSW [phone: 0267711287] School of Maths and Computer Science University of New England Armidale, Australia [http://cs.une.edu.au] ================================================= "Clothes make the man. Naked men are rarely taken seriously, or given employment." (Mark Twain) ================================================= |
From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-10-30 08:10:33
|
OK having a look at the ROX-Session interface file, I see a feed tag where Ken is providing a ppc binary. I'll play around with the packaging tutorial and make some amd64 binaries. Keep you posted. |
From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-10-30 15:33:30
|
ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with this rubbish. BTW, 0install.net went down today (SERVFAIL), it may be a good idea to change the interface file URI's and in injector/namespaces.py from 0install.net to zero-install.sf.net *shrug* *sleep* -- Lucas Hazel <lu...@di...> Digit Illogic Enterises [http://www.digitillogic.net] [phone: 0401313870] [ABN: 52841332786] AMAC Fast Track Computers Technician 209 Beardy Street, Armidale NSW [phone: 0267711287] School of Maths and Computer Science University of New England Armidale, Australia [http://cs.une.edu.au] ================================================= "Clothes make the man. Naked men are rarely taken seriously, or given employment." (Mark Twain) ================================================= |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2005-10-30 16:05:32
|
In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > this rubbish. What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-10-30 23:38:50
|
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > > this rubbish. > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > I'm using CRUX/Linux. I have dbus 0.50 installed. |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2005-10-31 13:17:16
|
In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > > > this rubbish. > > > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > I'm using CRUX/Linux. I have dbus 0.50 installed. In that case, vanilla ROX-Session definitely won't work and my patches should hopefully fix it. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-10-31 14:12:26
|
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 > > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > > > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > > > > this rubbish. > > > > > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > > > I'm using CRUX/Linux. I have dbus 0.50 installed. > > In that case, vanilla ROX-Session definitely won't work and my patches > should hopefully fix it. The patches fail against CVS (reversed or previously applied), have they already been commited? I gave 0launch'ing ROX-Session a try on a workstation at work today. Which also failed, unresolved symbols, I can't remember which ones. Your patches don't appear to adress this. I'll try again tomorrow if I have time. However this is the result on amd64: akira> startx ./.xinitrc.0 -- /usr/X11R6/bin/Xnest :1 _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/akira.digitillogic.net:1 _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6 Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! Agent pid 20062 Using D-BUS 0.3 interface. Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! waiting for X server to shut down All that happens is the Xnest windown starts up then closes immediately -- Lucas Hazel <lu...@di...> Digit Illogic Enterises [http://digitillogic.net/www] [phone: +61401313870] [ABN: 52841332786] AMAC Fast Track Computers Technician 209 Beardy Street, Armidale NSW [phone: +61267711287] School of Maths and Computer Science University of New England Armidale, Australia [http://cs.une.edu.au] ================================================= "Clothes make the man. Naked men are rarely taken seriously, or given employment." (Mark Twain) ================================================= |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2005-11-02 17:51:07
|
In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > In that case, vanilla ROX-Session definitely won't work and my patches > > should hopefully fix it. > > The patches fail against CVS (reversed or previously applied), have > they already been commited? I tried them on CVS last night. My older screensaver patch has already been applied, but the dbus patches applied OK, albeit with a bit of fuzz/offset. > I gave 0launch'ing ROX-Session a try on a workstation at work today. > Which also failed, unresolved symbols, I can't remember which ones. > Your patches don't appear to adress this. I'll try again tomorrow if I > have time. I haven't really got into 0launch properly yet, but I was having a play with that last night too, and I think it still only has ROX-Session 0.1.25 because 0launching ROX-Session is still "experimental". -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Guido S. <__g...@we...> - 2005-11-02 17:25:40
|
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 > > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > > > > > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > > > > this rubbish. > > > > > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. Why have your patches not made it into CVS yet? If it autodetects dbus version and does a conditional compile accordingly, I see not what is stopping you or Thomas/Stephen - the current situation is a mess... |
From: Tony H. <h...@re...> - 2005-11-02 17:48:14
|
In <200...@we...>, Guido Schimmels wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 Tony Houghton <h...@re...> > wrote: > > > > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, > > > > my patches might cure it. See > > > > <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > Why have your patches not made it into CVS yet? If it autodetects dbus > version and does a conditional compile accordingly, I see not what is > stopping you or Thomas/Stephen - the current situation is a mess... Can any sourceforge member commit into cvs? I thought it had to be a project admin, and I'm not one. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-11-02 18:25:22
|
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:24:10 +0100, Guido Schimmels wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > >> In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: >> >> > >> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 >> > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: >> > >> > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: >> > > >> > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with >> > > > this rubbish. >> > > >> > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my >> > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > Why have your patches not made it into CVS yet? > If it autodetects dbus version and does a conditional compile >accordingly, I see not what is stopping you or Thomas/Stephen - the >current situation is a mess... I'm part way through rewriting it all in Python. This will allow us to support all architectures and dbus versions with a single package. It should also sort out the memory leaks some people have reported. The problem is finding time to finish it... hopefully I'll be able to commit something by the weekend... -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2005-11-02 18:34:39
|
Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:24:10 +0100, Guido Schimmels wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 > > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > >> In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 > >> > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > >> > > >> > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > >> > > > this rubbish. > >> > > > >> > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > >> > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > > > Why have your patches not made it into CVS yet? > > If it autodetects dbus version and does a conditional compile > >accordingly, I see not what is stopping you or Thomas/Stephen - the > >current situation is a mess... > > I'm part way through rewriting it all in Python. This will allow us to > support all architectures and dbus versions with a single package. It > should also sort out the memory leaks some people have reported. The > problem is finding time to finish it... hopefully I'll be able to commit > something by the weekend... Ah. I just committed the patch. Oh well, let's just consider it a stop-gap. -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not to me. Not even CC. I'm really glad that worked. Those would have been terrible last words. |
From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2005-11-30 22:00:49
|
Stephen Watson <st...@ke...> wrote: > Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > > > I'm part way through rewriting it all in Python. This will allow us to > > support all architectures and dbus versions with a single package. It > > should also sort out the memory leaks some people have reported. The > > problem is finding time to finish it... hopefully I'll be able to commit > > something by the weekend... > > Ah. I just committed the patch. Oh well, let's just consider it a > stop-gap. Just a thought, as people are having trouble with 0.26 but the python re-write is still ongoing, should we make a final release of the C version with the dbus patches? -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not to me. Not even CC. You would make a good dalek |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-12-01 20:45:29
|
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:00:40 +0000, Stephen Watson wrote: > Stephen Watson <st...@ke...> wrote: > >> [quoted text muted] > > Just a thought, as people are having trouble with 0.26 but the python > re-write is still ongoing, It should be working. There may be a couple of config settings that aren't implemented yet, but I've been using it without any problems. It might need some minor tweaks for other versions of D-BUS, but that should be a lot easier than with the C version. The main problem with releasing anything at the moment is that anonymous CVS hasn't been updating for the last two weeks, so not many people can test things. -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2005-12-01 20:59:38
|
Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:00:40 +0000, Stephen Watson wrote: > The main problem with releasing anything at the moment is that anonymous > CVS hasn't been updating for the last two weeks, so not many people can > test things. The last change being included in the snapshots is from 21-Nov. However I think the reason not many people are testing it is that the last thing you said was not to use it because you were re-writing it... ;-) -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not to me. Not even CC. I'm really glad that worked. Those would have been terrible last words. |
From: Ken H. <ke...@ha...> - 2005-12-01 21:15:51
|
Thomas Leonard wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:00:40 +0000, Stephen Watson wrote: > > >>Stephen Watson <st...@ke...> wrote: >> >> >>>[quoted text muted] >> >>Just a thought, as people are having trouble with 0.26 but the python >>re-write is still ongoing, > > > It should be working. There may be a couple of config settings that aren't > implemented yet, but I've been using it without any problems. It might > need some minor tweaks for other versions of D-BUS, but that should be a > lot easier than with the C version. > > The main problem with releasing anything at the moment is that anonymous > CVS hasn't been updating for the last two weeks, so not many people can > test things. Care to release a CVS snapshot for (alpha-)test purposes? |
From: Lucas H. <lu...@di...> - 2005-11-03 08:15:00
|
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:20:10 +0000 Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:24:10 +0100, Guido Schimmels wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:16:41 +0000 > > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > > > >> In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:04:55 +0000 > >> > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > >> > > >> > > In <200...@di...>, Lucas Hazel wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > ARG! Now I'm getting segfaults, it's too late at night to deal with > >> > > > this rubbish. > >> > > > >> > > What distro are you running? Does it include dbus 0.3x? If so, my > >> > > patches might cure it. See <http://www.realh.co.uk/roxdbus.html>. > > > > Why have your patches not made it into CVS yet? > > If it autodetects dbus version and does a conditional compile > >accordingly, I see not what is stopping you or Thomas/Stephen - the > >current situation is a mess... > > I'm part way through rewriting it all in Python. This will allow us to > support all architectures and dbus versions with a single package. It > should also sort out the memory leaks some people have reported. The > problem is finding time to finish it... hopefully I'll be able to commit > something by the weekend... > Seeing as it's being rewritten in python, can I suggest a feature. The ability to run drop in python code. This way a python interpreter would not be needed for every rox app, as python is memory hungry to say the least. And python seems to be the language of choice among ROX application developers (at the risk of burning people who use different languages) -- Lucas Hazel <lu...@di...> Digit Illogic Enterises [http://digitillogic.net/www] [phone: +61401313870] [ABN: 52841332786] AMAC Fast Track Computers Technician 209 Beardy Street, Armidale NSW [phone: +61267711287] School of Maths and Computer Science University of New England Armidale, Australia [http://cs.une.edu.au] ================================================= "Clothes make the man. Naked men are rarely taken seriously, or given employment." (Mark Twain) ================================================= |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-11-03 21:16:23
|
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:20:10 +0000, Thomas Leonard wrote: [ ROX-Session ] > I'm part way through rewriting it all in Python. This will allow us to > support all architectures and dbus versions with a single package. It > should also sort out the memory leaks some people have reported. The > problem is finding time to finish it... hopefully I'll be able to commit > something by the weekend... I'm starting to commit changes to it now. Therefore, I suggest people don't do a 'cvs update' on ROX-Session for a few days, as many things won't be working correctly for a bit. So far, the new version does login and logout, XSettings (including the D-BUS interface that the config applets use), and runs ROX-Filer, your window manager and your auto-start scripts. It doesn't yet do the message log or non-XSettings settings (mouse acceleration, for example), and is quite buggy... -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-10-30 18:10:19
|
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:33:15 +1100, Lucas Hazel wrote: > BTW, 0install.net went down today (SERVFAIL), According to http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/4390048.stm: Police have launched an investigation after a massive fire destroyed an important research facility at the University of Southampton. ... It took more than 100 firefighters nearly ten hours to bring the fire under control. I don't know when DNS will be available again, so I suggest adding this to your /etc/hosts file to continue getting updates for the injector: 66.35.250.210 0install.net -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |